Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Hannah noted that he had spoken to Mr. March about the Developer's Agreement, <br />getting estimates from the City Engineer, reviewed 429 financing for the streets and <br />talked about moving furward with the Comprehensive Plan process. He understands the <br />City will be making changes to the Comprehensive Plan at the same time. He noted that <br />during the month of April they had resolved the boundary issues with the Vickers to the <br />south, and the driveways to the north. He then suggested the City approve the MUSA <br />swap concept contingent on the work by the consuhant, and the eventual review and <br />approval by the Metropolitan Council and MUSA governing body. <br /> <br />Mr. March explained the Planning Commission has seen the MUSA swap plan and <br />Council has approved it, but a public hearing was not held at the Planning Commission <br />level. He noted the MUSA swap is contingent upon final plat approval. Mr. March then <br />indicated that the information has been forwarded to the consultant, and the consultant <br />will forward it to Metropolitan Council for its response. Mr. March also noted that the <br />consuhant would be at the next Planning Commission meeting to discuss the proposed <br />changes to the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson questioned what year the second phase of the development came <br />into the MUSA. Mr. March explained the top portion of the development is in the 2001 - <br />2005 timeframe and the bottom portion of the development is in the 2006 - 2011 <br />timeframe. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine questioned how much acreage was contained in Parcel A and how <br />much acreage was contained in Parcel C. Mr. Hannah indicated Parcel A was 20.185 <br />acres and Parcel C was 20 acres. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine questioned what type of agreement was reached with the property <br />owners to the north. Mr. Hannah explained the developer would be reconstructing the <br />driveways as per the drawing that was agreed to and signed. He then noted there may be <br />an issue with one of the driveways that would need City approval. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers noted there would need to be a public hearing on the <br />other changes proposed. Mr. March explained the City is in the process of obtaining GIS <br />data for maps that are needed as attachments to the Comprehensive Plan. He then noted <br />the consultant hopes to have the maps done by the June Planning and Zoning meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Tom Wilharber, 6849 Centerville Road, explained that his property is to the west of <br />Parcel C and that he wants to be sure he will not be assessed for City services, as he will <br />not be serviced. He then noted there is drainage that comes from the west that flows <br />through the Vickers' property and then through the proposed development, and asked the <br />developer to be sure that the drainage is not interrupted. <br /> <br />Motion bv Commissioner Kilian. seconded bv Commissioner DeVine to close the <br />public hearinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Page 7 of12 <br />