My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-12-05 P &Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2000
>
2000-12-05 P &Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 3:32:50 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 3:17:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Motion by Commissioner Brainard. seconded bv Commissioner DeVine to close the <br />DubUc hearine:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. <br /> <br />III. APPEARANCES <br /> <br />I. Mr. Roger Shimon - ZoninglElectrical Fencing <br /> <br />Mr. Shimon, 1751 Peltier Lake Drive, was present and expressed his concern for <br />electrical fence running along the back of his property, eight (8) feet off the property line. <br />Mr. Shimon stated that there should be a larger buffer and requested that the Commission <br />modifies the ordinance accordingly. <br /> <br />Ms. Buckbee stated she was the owner of the electrical fence and that the fence was <br />previously fifty (50) feet off the property line as a courtesy to neighboring residents. <br />However, recently the fencing was moved to within eight (8) feet of the property line. <br /> <br />Mr. March stated that R-I zoning allows for electrical fencing and that the issue is <br />whether the ordinance needed to be amended to include a buffer zone between properties <br />where electric fencing is allowed and where other residentially zoned areas abut. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson stated that the current ordinance allows a property owner to place a <br />fence directly on the property line if so desire and that it is a courtesy that the property <br />owner has left an eight (8) foot buffer. <br /> <br />Commissioner McLean questioned whether there were similar properties that have <br />electrical fencing. <br /> <br />Ms. Buckbee stated that there were other properties within Centerville large enough to <br />have livestock but was unsure if others have electrical fencing. <br /> <br />Mr. March indicated the Commission would need to amend Ordinance #4 if they felt <br />there was a need to incorporate a requirement for a buffer zone between properties with <br />electrical fencing and those without. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine questioned whether Council Liaison Vickers' property had <br />electrical fencing. Council Liaison Vickers stated she did not but thought there was old <br />barbwire fencing located on your property. Commissioner DeVine stated he did not feel <br />the need to amend Ordinance #4. <br /> <br />2. Mr. Terry Sager - Mini-Storage <br /> <br />Mr. Terry Sager and his partner, Ed Sadeline were present and requested the <br />Commission's willingness in allowing a mini-storage facility in Centerville. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brainard questioned whether the facility would have an on-site attendant. <br />Mr. Sadeline stated it would not. <br /> <br />Mr. March stated that previously a proposal for mini-storage had been denied due to <br />limited space in the industrial park, the facility did not use city utilities, and did not create <br />jobs for the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.