Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the unit could be moved ten (10) feet <br />away from the property line. Mr. Palzer stated the unit is currently three (3) feet <br />from the property line and could not be on the other side of the trail as it is private <br />property. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber inquired if the unit could be placed near the sidewalk to remain <br />accessible and placed on a slab. He stated an enclosure could be built at a later <br />date. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she would like to see this change made <br />as the accessory structure is closer than five (5) feet to the property line. <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer noted the unit could be moved to the suggested location. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis noted he would not be voting on this issue because he felt <br />the movement would be opening a can of worms for other property owners near <br />parks. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Council <br />Member Nelson to aporove the movement of the satellite in Ea!!le Park to be <br />ten (10) feet from the property line as stated within Ordinance #4 for <br />accessory structures. All in favor. Motion carried. (Sweenev opposed) <br />(Travis abstained). <br /> <br />VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />Hunter's Crossing Ditch - Tabled Julv 26 and August 9.2000 <br /> <br />Mr. Hoeft addressed the Council and stated the Title Company wanted to <br />exchange some deeds for the northerly plats. He stated the City did receive an <br />easement for the ditch and the entire waterway was within City property. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson <br />to O1Inthn...;'7o tho rH'1 A ,t",,;n;~t"'9t(\... to t}oVOf'nt,. tho nnH ,..lo;1h" ,",110,.11;: if '!lH ,~"it <br />.~ ~._.~_~____ ._._ ___ ____.__..__._h.~_ __ ________ ~~_.... ~.__. ....._A.A. .~___~ a. .~.. AhH_ <br /> <br />is within the City easement or City owned oroperty for Hunter's Crossin!! <br />Ditch. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Ordinance #4 <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers noted she would like an update on how <br />grand-fathering worked with items not in compliance with the Ordinance. Mr. <br />Hoeft stated he would address all future items as they arose. He noted an <br />amortization could be placed on non-conforming uses to gain compliance over a <br />number of years ifthe Council so desired. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the dump truck issue would be <br />handled. Mr. Hoeft indicated a letter would be sent out to the homeowner <br />requesting compliance and allowing a reasonable amount of time for compliance. <br /> <br />4 <br />