Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />- -- -I <br /> <br />Jim March <br /> <br />To: Wayne LeBlanc; Theresa Brenner; Tom Peterson; Tim Rehbine; Ray Devine; Michelle Moser; Lori <br />Dam; John McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Patricia Scott; Elizabeth Scheller, Doug Porter, <br />Dave Kilian; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairbrother; City Council <br /> <br />Subject: Week in Review <br /> <br />Week in Review <br /> <br />July 21,2000 <br /> <br />Building Permits this Period = <br />Building Permits YTD <br />New Homes Year to Date <br /> <br />4 <br />= 102 <br />= 27 <br /> <br />********************************************+ ,********************************************** <br /> <br />. I attended a meeting at the offices of the Met Council yesterday, The community <br />development review panel met to rank the applications for the Livable Communities Act <br />Demonstration Grant Program. There Nere 28 development applications in our funding <br />category, Eleven applications have been removed from consideration, Our application <br />was not one of the applications removed from consideration, The remaining 17 <br />applications are requesting approximately $30 million worth of funding with only about $9,9 <br />million available. Our application is cu'rently on the borderline. <br /> <br />It became apparem mal Inis inlllal rev,,,1I'I was S<.l"I"wflallJvliLi~ai. Ti"",,,, were [i I. cc <br />County Commissioners on the review ranel with several Council members from large <br />suburban communities. The first hour of the meeting was spent discussing conflict of <br />interest by members of the review panE>!. An Anoka County Commissioner was not Sitting <br />on this panel. <br /> <br />The group used a ranking system comprised as follows: +, +0, 0, 0+, 0-, -0, and -. <br />This ranking system seemed confusing to the audience as well as the review panel <br />members. Our application received a mostly positive, but a mixed review of 3+, 5 +0, 1 0,3 <br />0-, and 2 -, I was shocked to see that one of the panel members that gave us the lowest <br />score was Lucy Thompson (one of our Design Team visit co-leaders). We had <br />incorporated three of the Design Team recommendations in our proposal. The only item <br />that I believe Lucy could be opposed to is the demolition of the public works building that a <br />Design Team member had sketched as a future site of a potential "Heritage Museum". I <br />am concerned that her low score of our project could knock us out of the running for <br />approximately $1.3 million dollars. <br /> <br />I have contacted Mary Capra in regards to this issue and she is going to contact Theresa <br />Brenner, I think that if our Design Team visit co-chairs would write a letter stating that the <br />community is seeking to preserve our heritage in other ways and that the Heritage Museum <br />has not remained a community priority, this may influence Lucy's opinion on the issue. <br />7/21100 <br />