2000-06-06 P & Z Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

., 2. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. 3. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant and special privilege as denied by this ordinance or to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 4. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light in the air of the adjacent property, unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the residents of the City. The Chair requested comment on each individual criterion. Brief comments took place that the property and existing building met the existing Ordinance #4 criteria for requesting a Variance and consensus was to approve DCS Properties' Variance request. Motion by Member Kilian. and seconded by Member Brainard to close the Public Hearing. Members DeVine and Sheppard Abstained. Motion carried. Motion by Chair Hanson. and seconded bv Member DeVine to open the Public Hearing for consideration of Richard S. Carlson & Associates request to Re-classifY the MUSA in re!!ards to the Hunter's Crossin!! Addition. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Mr. March reported that the developer of Hunter's Crossing (Mr. Richard S. Carlson & Associates) is requesting that the property lying southward of LaMotte Park (previously owned Pracher and Bauman properties) be allowed to be developed in the year 2000 instead of the proposed 2001 development quadrant contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Carlson has proposed to provide the City with an additional $500/10t (37 lots) in Park Dedication Fees. Mr. March reiterated that the Commission's consideration of the MUSA Re-classification and any action made by same should be conditioned upon three other entity's approval besides the City's; the City ofLino Lakes, Anoka County and the Metropolitan Council. Mr. March also stated that Mr. Carlson must come before the Commission again to request Final Plat Approval. The Commission questioned if the City's Engineer and Mr. PaIzer (Building OfficiaVPublic Works) had reviewed the presented material. Mr. March stated that both had reviewed. Motion bv Member DeVine. seconded bv Chair Hanson to close the Public Hearing for consideration of Richard S. Carlson & Associates request to Re-classuy the MUSA in re!!ards to the Hunter's Crossing Addition. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Member DeVine, seconded bv Member McLean to recommend approval and forward Richard S. Carlson & Associates reQuest to Re-classifY the MUSA (Amend the City's Comorehensive Plan) in regards to the Hunter's Crossin!! Development. contin~ent Page3 of 4