Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Patrick O~Connor <br />1661 Lake/and Circle <br />Centervil/le~ MN 55038 <br />USA <br />651-762-8453 <br /> <br />September 26, 2001 <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Committee <br />Centerville <br /> <br />Dear Members: <br /> <br />I have been speaking to Teresa in the city offices concerning the City of Centerville Ordinance <br />#4 Item C. As it is written, it doesn't make sense and I asked her to clarify it for me. Although <br />she was extremely helpful, she was unable to explain why it has been worded in this way. <br /> <br />I should like to know what is the intent of the ordinance? Presumably, the original intent was to <br />impose certain restrictions on the indefiinite parking of various units in a driveway. As item C <br />reads, these units are allowed to park wthout any restrictions, which cannot be the committee's <br />original intent. It seems that the word "no" should have been placed before "more" so it would <br />read... may be stored outside of a structure for no more than forty-eight (48) hours.... Perhaps <br />you could refer back to the committee's minutes to establish the original intent. <br /> <br />If; It was, and is, the committee's intent to allow unrestricted parking of non-personal motor <br />vehicles and other units, on a driveway, then, the words... for more than forty-eight hours.. <br />should be struck out as they are superfluous and confusing. However, if it is the purpose to <br />allow indeterminate parking, I think that the committee should review item C. How can it be <br />fair and equitable to his neighbors to allow a householder to park a 35ft Motor-Home and, say <br />a 30ft Motor-Boat, outside his house forever and a day? <br /> <br />Perhaps you will let me have your decision in due course. <br /> <br />Yours sincerely, <br /> <br />0~~J( ;J~ <br />,4 <br /> <br />Copy: Mayor T. Swedberg: <br /> <br />. <br />