My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-07 P & Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2002
>
2002-05-07 P & Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2009 9:04:34 AM
Creation date
7/20/2009 9:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes explained that Staff is having an issue with winter construction and <br />indicated that all requirements ror occupancy are met with the exception of the <br />driveways. She then asked whether the Commission would consider putting a <br />requirement in the Ordinance that Class 5 must be installed prior to passing the footing <br />inspection in order to eliminate this type of issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer commented he felt that type of language should be put in the developer's <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis indicated that a previous Council had determined that every <br />development would escrow an amount to include a silt fence and gravel drive on every <br />lot but that was misinterpreted and is not being done. <br /> <br />It was the consent of the Commission to ask that the developer's agreements contain the <br />language governing the gravel drives. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Ken had said that attached garages were defined as an <br />accessory structure and asked that it be fixed. <br /> <br />The Commission asked Ms. Moore-Sykes to have Ken locate the error in the Ordinance <br />so it could be fixed ifneed be. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated Ken bad asked the Commission to consider allowing fences <br />on the property line without requiring signatures. <br /> <br />The Commission indicated it had no interest in allowing fences on property lines without <br />signatures. <br /> <br />The Commission indicated it would like to hold the public hearing on Ordinance #4 at the <br />June meeting. <br /> <br />VI. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Ordinance #3-B - Curfew City of Centerville <br /> <br />a. City of Circle Pines (Anoka County) <br />b. City of Lexington <br />c. City ofHermantown <br />d. City of Aitkin <br /> <br />Chair Hansen indicated there may be an issue with curfew at Waterworks because of the <br />teen nights. <br /> <br />It was the consent of the Commission to ask Staff to discuss the curfew Ordinance with <br />Waterworks to make them aware of the potential issue with teen nights. <br /> <br />~~~~~~~~~- <br /> <br />Page 70fl0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.