My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-03-12 P& Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2002
>
2002-03-12 P& Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2009 9:29:29 AM
Creation date
7/20/2009 9:26:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Motion by Commission Member McLean. seconded bv Commission Member Kilian <br />to recommend to Council that the C-I Districts be rezoned to match the adjoining <br />parcels subject to approval bv the City Attornev. Aves - 4, Navs - O. Abstain -I <br />(Wilharber), Motion carried. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber abstained from voting because he said he feels there had to be a <br />reason why the property was zoned C-I and he does not think it would have taken much <br />to add it to the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />VI. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Consideration of Mr. and Mrs. Carlie Olson's Request (Dog Kennel/Industrial <br />District). <br /> <br />No action was needed on this item because the Commission sent Ordinance #4 on to <br />Council for consideration and approval. <br /> <br />VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />1. Conditional Use Permits - Containing Same in Ordinance #4 <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had provided information from another City concerning <br />the use of conditional use permits for nonconforming uses. She then commented that the <br />conditional use permits had not been used for accessory structures. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber indicated he did a little driving around after that issue was <br />discussed and commented that there are a lot of sheds built too close to homes to meet the <br />current Ordinance requirements. He then commented that Mr. Michaels had called City <br />Hall and been told he could reconstruct his shed in the same location. <br /> <br />Acting Chair DeVine said he felt the City needed to be realistic and realize that Mr. <br />Michaels was given faulty information and the City should not make him tear down the <br />shed and should give him a permit to allow him to maintain it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber commented that the new procedures would take care of these <br />problems in the future. <br /> <br />Acting Chair DeVine explained that over the past year or so there has been a big push to <br />try to eliminate most, if not all, variances that the City gives out by redoing ordinances. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber commented, unless you build a city from scratch, there will be <br />cases where you need to grant variances. He then said he did not think the City looked <br />too bad with regard to what previous Councils had approved. <br /> <br />Page 6 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.