Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To \\'ayne LeBlanc and Members of the Lake Association Board, <br />. <br /> <br />After reading Wayne's proposal to the City of Centerville to impose restrictions on Peltier Lake, I was very disturbed. Many of arguments in <br />the letter are either invalid or pure opinion, yet it was presented to a governing body in an official manor to convince them to take action as a <br />result of it. Action that a large number of lake shore owners may not agree with. I strongly disagree with the proposed restrictions and I <br />w of several lake home owners that share my opinion. <br /> <br />I'll start from the top. Wayne states that a waterski course was constructed in a "sensitive" part of Peltier Lake. Sensitive? Why is it <br />considered sensitive? He said it harbors coontail and other beneficial aquatic plants. I was back in that "sensitive" area several times last <br />summer, and a large portion of it is covered with a disgusting green slimy algae. The weeds are so thick they are probably choking all the <br />oxygen out of the water. I don't see that area as having "beneficial aquatic plants". As for the coontail, when we first moved here in 1994, <br />the first couple summers it was common to find floating reed bogs (with coontail) that had drifled in to our lake frontage. Interesting, that <br />Wayne said "I have never seen before large floating mats of coontail aquatic plants in midlake or seen so many wash ashore like they did in <br />August." I couldn't disagree more. They were a menace. For the last several years (3-4?) the reed bogs have been rare. I don't see any <br />evidence of a waterski course damaging coontail. If the waterski boats are clearing a path through those weeds that were so thick you could <br />practically walk on them, I'd see that as a benefit. <br /> <br />OK, so put the weed argument aside. Wayne probably also thinks it is a sensitive area because ofthe Herons. Boat traffic in that area is <br />surely harassing those poor Herons. Based on what? Herons are afraid of boats? Is that why they sit on our boat lifl canopy every morning? <br />I don't believe for a second that the Herons were disturbed by boat traffic. We've seen them flying over all areas of the lake, boat traffic or <br />not. He claims their disappearance coincides with the presence of the ski course. Well as I recall, it was around the time that Wayne and his <br />select followers started publicly opposing the ski course (1999), that the heaviest population of the birds was observed. We continued to see <br />the heavy population of birds all the while the ski course was still in use. When they removed the course, the next year the Herons had left the <br />island. So the whole summer that the course was NOT back there, the birds were not inhabiting the island. Isn't it likely that they just over- <br />populated their nesting grounds and moved on? <br /> <br />Wayne said he believes huge amounts of silt were put in suspension by the ski boat traffic, and that the water quality this mil was the worst in <br />22 years, which he attributes to the ski boats. First of all, I disagree that Fall 200 I was the worst water quality. I remember it being much <br />worse the previous year (summer of2000), and that was the year that there was no slalom course north of the island. Second, he said he <br />"believes" the silt was put in suspension. No met, no evidence, just his opinion. Third, even if silt was stirred up, the weeds are so thick <br />back there I really think the water quality in that area would be severely hampered from migrating to the rest of the lake. <br /> <br />ne said after the sheriffmade them remove the waterski course they continued to set up the course in the same location. He neglected to <br />ion the sheriff gave them 2 weeks to remove it. They used it in the 2 week period. Later they moved it to 2 different parts of the lake, <br />which Wayne says caused hardship and restricted others from full use of the lake. He said "They essentially cordoned off their own huge <br />private area in what is supposed to be a public resource." I strongly disagree. The ski course was right in front of our house. We had no <br />problem boating through it. We saw plenty of other non-skiing boats go through it. The primary reason boats would avoid it was when <br />people were using it for skiing, and that is going to happen whether there is a course there or not. It is not "claiming" a section of the lake as <br />Wayne portrayed it to be. His argument of it reserving an area 2300 ft by 400 ft is quite inaccurate. The distance between the outside buoys <br />is 75 ft. How did the 75 get inflated to 400? It is because Wayne decided to give it an arbitrary 150ft buffer around the outside buoys. He <br />claimed that Peltier Lake is small, and this inflated 2300ft by 400ft area was taking practically 1/2 of the fishing area ofa 2000 by 4000ft <br />lake. This is also invalid. Even if you accept his inflated footprint, which in good faith you cannot, it doesn't work out to even close to 1/2. <br />Plus, I know of at least 3 other lakes: <br />Island Lake in Shoreview, Reshanau Lake in Lino Lakes, and Sunset Lake in Washington County, that are SMALLER than Peltier and have <br />had water ski courses on them. He suggested that Centerville Lake is a possible alternative for a ski course because it is much bigger in its <br />"usable area". To me that implies that north end of Peltier Lake (north of the island) is not usable. I disagree with declaring that area of the <br />lake as unusable. It is plenty usable with a water ski course back there. It is usable for boating around the island, and I don't feel like we <br />should be limited to no wake speed when we do so. <br /> <br />He also said fishing is virtually impossible around the ski course. Well, one of the lake home owners in our area stated that fishing was <br />improved by the area where the ski course was, because the weeds weren't so thick. There's nothing to prevent people from fishing in the ski <br />course area except when it is actually in use, which is a small percentage of time, <br /> <br />Wayne's letter portrays these indivuals as selfish and inconsiderate. Yet, these are the same people that were generous enough to host a Lake <br />Association Party, inviting every lake home owner on the lake. They are the same people that went to considerable time and trouble to line <br />up a professional weed cutter to harvest the Curly LeafPondweed which has exploded in population the last several years, I noticed Wayne <br />said nothing about that as a possible cause of diminishing water quality. These people are always willing to help their neighbors, and <br />Wayne's portrayal ofthem was innaceurate and unjust. <br /> <br />ottom line is that a decision like this that will affect all lake home owners should not be decided based on the opinions and comments of <br />0.." __.an. It should be based on a majority vote of all the lake home owners. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br />Henry Farmerie <br />