My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-01-08 P & Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2002
>
2002-01-08 P & Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2009 9:38:44 AM
Creation date
7/20/2009 9:37:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF l'vllNNESOTA <br /> <br />RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT <br />BOARD OF MANAGERS <br /> <br />RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT <br />IN THE COUNTIES OF ANOKA.., <br />HENNEPIN, RAMSEY Al\TD <br />WASHINGTON <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND ORDER <br /> <br />In the Matter of Application <br />for Variance of Thomas and Bonnie Spivak <br /> <br />Baseri upon the record and proceedings in this matter the Rice Creek Watershed District <br />Board of Managers malces the following: <br /> <br />FINDINGS <br /> <br />I. Thomas and BOll11ie Spivak (Applicants) own a single family residence on Lot 14, <br />Block I of the Eagle Pass development in Centerville, Mill11esota. Applicants propose to <br />construct an addition to their single family residence which would include a 280 SF sunroom and <br />112 SF deck. The proposed addition would be built on stilts off the northeast comer of the <br />dwelling. <br /> <br />') The proposed project would encroach approximately 20 feet into the 100"foot fronl . <br />centerline of Clearwater Creek easement conidor; such drainage and utility easements on the lot <br />were earlier conveyed to the City ofCenterville lmder RCWD Permit 96-104. <br /> <br />J. The District Rules require a 100-foot easement or set-back from the centerline of <br />Clearwater Creek. <br /> <br />4. Applicants now request a variance from the District's 100.foot easement set-back <br />requiremem to construct the proposed addition approximately 20 feet within the IOO-foot <br />Clearwater Creek easement coni dOL <br /> <br />5. District Engineers have advised that rate contra! and water quality treatment regarding <br />the proposed project will not be an issue since limited new impervious area is being created and <br />runoff will remain as overland flow to Clearwater Creek. First floor freeboard requirements are <br />also not an issue since the proposed addition is raised to the second Hoar on stilts. Finally, the <br />District would have adequate access for ditch maintenance of Clearwater Creek with the <br />proposed 20- foot easement encroachment. <br /> <br />6. In order to grant a variance the District Board of Managers must determine the <br />staIHlards in its variance policy have been met <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.