My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-08-05 P & Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2003
>
2003-08-05 P & Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2009 12:59:04 PM
Creation date
7/20/2009 12:56:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />June 11, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />few years ago they questioned if they would be a safety hazard due to the possibility of <br />them being crushed by snow. Most of the structures, however, are to cover things such as <br />boats. Staff did not believe there would be safety issues from that standpoint. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps suggested there be an exception to the permit requirement for a situation <br />such as a party, as the structure would only be needed for a day or two. He directed staff <br />to bring the suggestions of the Commission to the Council for discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle commented not all of these structures are cheap. There are some structures <br />that can house four rv's at a cost of $6,000. <br /> <br />Chair Schaps inquired if a structure of that size would fall under the accessory structure <br />ordinance. Mr. Smyser responded it is very common in situations like this for the <br />manufacturer to say a permit is not required. That, however, is up to the individual <br />municipality. <br /> <br />Mr. Tralle asked how a large structure like this would fit into a rural zone. Mr. Smyser <br />responded currently the amount of allowed accessory building space is dependent on the <br />size of the lot, and the temporary structures could be included in this. <br /> <br />Mr. Tra1le questioned if passing an ordinance in relation to these structures would create <br />another ordinance that is not going to be enforced. <br /> <br />Mr. Lyden asked how many inquiries or complaints staff receives regarding these <br />structures in a one year period. Mr. Smyser responded in the last 12 months staffhas <br />been contacted regarding this approximately 12 times, with two or three of these being <br />complaints. They are not peppered with complaints, but by the time we are, there would <br />already be a problem. He indicated staff will discuss the suggestions of the Commission <br />and bring back the possibilities to be considered. They may not even want to deal with it, <br />but he thinks it is important to have the discussion. <br /> <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.