Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Centerville <br />December 3, 2002 <br />Plnnning illld Zoning Commission <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes copied the PUD requirements and handed them out. <br /> <br />Mrs. Buckbee indicated she has discussed this matter at length with the developer and he <br />feels he meets the minimum lot requirements and a PUD is not required. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the lots would not be recorded and platted as one big <br />one, it would be two smaller lots. She then said that another reason staff supports the <br />PUD is that it would help preserve the natural amenities of the land. <br /> <br />Mrs. Buckbee requested a letter from the City indicating why the developer is required to <br />have a PUD approval. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that she and the realtor have discussed <br />the matter. <br /> <br />Mrs. Buckbee indicated she applied for the special use permit on her own rather than <br />waiting another month. Ms. Moore-Sykes suggested continuing this until after the <br />preliminary plat approval and include the PUD as part of the final plat process. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes recommended continuing tIllS to the January meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes asked if the transaction could be finalized with preliminary plat <br />approval. <br /> <br />Mrs. Buckbee commented that she would not stay now after hearing all the issues and <br />would continue to search for other property if the current deal does not work out. <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Svetin of 1687 Peltier Lake Drive indicated that residents had said at the last <br />Council meeting that they were not interested in having twin homes on the property. He <br />then indicated that if tIle multi-family housing were eliminated it would not be necessary <br />to have a PUD. <br /> <br />Mr. Svetin indicated that residents did not object to single family housing but everybody <br />said that the multi family housing did not fit into the area. Mrs. Buckbee questioned why <br />residents had issues with multifamily housing. <br /> <br />Mr. Svetin indicated that he and the other residents would fight hard to keep multifamily <br />housing out of the development. <br /> <br />Mrs. Buckbee indicated she could not foresee the developer backing off of on the <br />twinhomes as they are an allowed use under the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Conunissioner DeVine indicated that one of the requirements for the PUD approval is <br />that the use would not be detrimental. <br /> <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />