Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Centervi1le <br />Council Meeting Mioutes <br />September 14, 2005 <br /> <br />4. Resolution #04-043 - Assigning Duties as They Relate to Handling Banking <br /> <br />Transactions for the City of Cenlerville <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson explained that the Resolution would authorize the Finance <br />Director to move money around to different accounts within Main Street bank for <br />investment purposes but not allow money to be moved outside of the bank. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Terwav to annrove <br />Resolution #04-043 as nresented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />vm. OLD BUSINESS <br /> <br />I. Review Draft of Memorandum of Understanding on CSAH 14 <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson and Council discussed the County's response to the draft <br />MOU and Council agreed Members are not ready to sign at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra indicated that she does not agree that the City should pay more due to <br />increased costs through the County park. <br /> <br />2. Dock/Bridges - Drainage Utility Easements <br /> <br />Bob Dolfay of 1937 Eagle Trail indicated they have a bridge extending over an easement <br />and asked Council to consider allowing them to keep it there as that is the only access to <br />the back of his property for maintenance. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft provided an overview for Council on the liability issue and said he <br />feels the bridge is different as it does not provide access to the water but to go over and <br />provide access to the back piece of property so it is not as much of a concern as the docks <br />would be. He then said that the City's policy and, possibly, the Ordinance would need to <br />be changed to allow the dock to remain as it is currently the policy that no structures are <br />allowed in easements. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra asked that the building official work on this Ordinance. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft requested that the property owner be required to obtain insurance <br />coverage naming the City as an additional insured. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that he did some research and does not think that docks <br />and bridges would be covered under a normal home owner's umbrella policy. <br /> <br />Council agreed to consider allowing bridges provided that there are standards established <br />and that insurance naming the City as an additional insured is provided. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated he would discourage allowing decorative bridges in <br />easements but allow functional bridges tlJat aid in maintenance. He then noted that the <br /> <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />L <br />