Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Centerville <br />March 9, 2005 <br />City CouociJ Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Council briefly discussed some of the things that have been done to improve surface <br />water pollution. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Broussard Vickers <br />to close the nublic heann!!. AU in favor. Motion carned unanimouslv. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra closed the public hearing at 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />vn. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Discontinue Gas Services at 7071 & 7073 Centerville Road <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member <br />Lakso to discontinue !!as services at 7071 & 7073 CentervilIe Road. Ail in favor. <br />Motion carned unanimouslv. <br /> <br />2. Request for Additional Funding - $10.100 (CDBG - Downtown Redevelopment <br />Planning) <br /> <br />Finance Director Meyer addressed Council and explained that the City has been awarded <br />a grant of $75,000 but the original budget for the project was $85,100 and that is why <br />Staffis seeking authorization for the additional $10,100. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Paar to authorize <br />the reauest for additional fundin!! $10.100 for CDBG downtown redeveloDment <br />Dlannin!!. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar asked whether Mr. Meyer felt this was fiscally responsible for the <br />City and if he was in favor of it. <br /> <br />Mr. Meyer explained that redevelopment is very important to the future tax base of the <br />City and that is why he is in favor of expending these funds to make sure that the <br />redevelopment plans are done right. He further commented that this investment is to <br />ensure that the future development of the City benefits the tax base in the best way <br />possible. <br /> <br />VOTE: AIl in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />3. Water Tower Containment Elimination <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he and Staff have discussed this matter and are <br />concerned that agreement to eliminate the containment system could leave the City open <br />to liability should there be an issue with over spray. He then said that he would look into <br />the situation with the contractor to ensure that liability remains with the contractor and <br />not the City. <br /> <br />Page40f9 <br />