Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. March indicated he did not think upgrading the shcd to provide for the one hour fire <br />protection would work in all situations. He then indicated that thc way his house is built <br />there is a nook behind the garage and the main part of the house where thc shed is <br />located. He further indicated that, ifhc is required to move the shed, it would bc moved <br />to the farthcst back corner of his lot and his neighbors would have to look at it. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that the City has allowed zcro clearance in <br />the past as long as the structurc complied with the fire code. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that using a conditional use permit rather than changing the <br />Ordinance would allow the City to retain control over the other sheds in town. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber questioned whether, after receiving his letter of noncompliance, <br />Mr. March had taken a look to see if there are other noncomplying sheds in town. <br /> <br />Mr. March indicated he had not driven through the south portion of the community but <br />stated there are other noncompliant sheds in his area. <br /> <br />Commissioner McLean questioned whether the shed was nonconforn1ing all along. <br /> <br />Mr. March indicated his shed has been nonconforming since the home was built. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that the resident is not required to bring the <br />shed into compliance unless it burns down or falls down. <br /> <br />Mr. March asked thc City to look into the matter and notify him by letter as to whether <br />the shed needs to be moved. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she did not understand where the address <br />list containing propcrtics with nonconforming structures originated and who issued the <br />letters. She then indicated that thc structure is nonconforming and, since nothing has <br />changed, it is grand fathered in. <br /> <br />Ms. Moorc-Sykes indicated she would look into the matter. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the first Tuesday in January was January 1,2002. She <br />then asked when the Commission wished to hold its January meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued and the Commission asked Ms. Moore-Sykes to find out ifMr. Palzcr <br />is available on January 8, 2002 or if the meeting needs to be held on January 3, 2002 and <br />report back to the Commission. <br /> <br />Page 8 of9 <br />