My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-12-28 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2005
>
2005-12-28 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:37:26 PM
Creation date
1/6/2006 1:49:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />Insurance Trust <br />145 University Avenue West, St Paul, MN 55103-2044 <br />(651) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 <br />Fax: (651) 281.1298 · TOO: (651) 281-1290 <br />www.lmnc.org <br /> <br />RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION <br />ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS <br />BETWEEN COUNCILMEMBERS <br /> <br />E-mail correspondence can be an unintentional conduit for city officials to violate the Minnesota <br />Open Meeting Law. This memo outlines some points elected officials and members of city <br />committees and boards should be aware of to avoid inadvertently violating the Open Meeting <br />Law. <br /> <br />The Open Meeting Law <br />Under the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn. Stat. ~13D, meetings of at least a quorum of the <br />city councilor one of its committees to discuss city business must be publicized and open to the <br />public, subject to a few exceptions. A primary purpose of the law is to make sure information <br />and deliberations about city business are available to the public. <br /> <br />The law applies to any discussion about city business, not just voting or official actions, and to <br />any gathering of a quorum of the council or committee. In most cities a quorum is three or more <br />council or committee members. <br /> <br />It's easy to imagine situations where a quorum might gather-coffee at the local cafe, pre- or <br />post-meeting discussions, a wedding reception or community celebration are all common spots <br />for councilmembers to meet. There are also some not-so-obvious ways a quorum might meet, for <br />instance in a serial meeting-imagine councilmember A talks to councilmember B, B talks to <br />councilmember C, and C talks to A. Another is through written correspondence, or through <br />telephone conference calls. Any of these scenarios would create an open meeting concern if the <br />group discussed city business. <br /> <br />Violating the Open Meeting Law carries with it penalties including personal liability for up to <br />$300 per occurrence and forfeiture of office for officials who intentionally violate the law three <br />times. Reasonable costs and attorney fees can also be awarded if the court finds specific intent to <br />violate the law. <br /> <br />Electronic communications and the Open Meeting Law <br />The Minnesota Open Meeting Law has a number of tricky aspects, not the least of which results <br />from increasing reliance on e-mail communication between council or committee members. <br /> <br />E-mail makes a serial meeting easier by allowing council or committee members to forward <br />messages from one person to the next. Imagine one councilmember e-mailing another to suggest <br />the pros and cons of a particular city decision. The recipient forwards the e-mail to another <br />councilmember, along with his or her own comments and interpretations. <br /> <br />This material Is provided as gellerallllformatlon and Is not a substltute for legallldvlce. <br />COllSUlt your atturney for advice cOllcernlng spaclflc situations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.