My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-08-26 Handouts @ Mtg.
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2009
>
2009-08-26 Handouts @ Mtg.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2009 10:53:58 AM
Creation date
8/27/2009 10:53:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5. During 2008, the Water Fund and the Sewer Fund disbursed the $200,000 and $400,000, <br />respectively, previously authorized for the public works building. The Water and Sewer <br />Funds had sufficient cash reserves so the cash and investment balances, again after <br />adjusting for cash advances, decreased by only $55,184 and $223,791, respectively. <br /> <br />Based on this information, transactions for the purchase of the public works building <br />appear reasonable and appropriate. The fact that some money from the Water and Sewer <br />Funds was used for the purchase should not have a bearing on special assessments, as <br />only properties benefitting can be specially assessed. Centerville's hook-up fees are <br />classified as nonoperating revenue to provide funding for expansion. Water and sewer <br />rates charged for services are based on the City's operating costs. <br /> <br />Mileae:e and Uniform Reimbursements <br /> <br />The petitioners were concerned that mileage and uniform reimbursements were not in <br />accordance with City policies or were not properly approved. Specifically, they were concerned <br />that the City Administrator and the Finance Director were allowed to submit mileage <br />reimbursement requests without the same level of support as other employees and that a <br />$50 annual uniform allowance was given to public works staff without proper City Council <br />approval. <br /> <br />We discussed the adopted City policy and procedure regarding employee mileage reimbursement <br />with the City Administrator, reviewed a sample of claims submitted by the City Administrator <br />and the City Finance Director for reimbursement of mileage, and reviewed City Council meeting <br />minutes. We noted the following. <br /> <br />1. The City of Centerville does not require any type of support (such as Mapquest@ or <br />odometer readings) to be submitted with mileage reimbursement requests. The City of <br />Centerville's procedure is to have the accounts payable/payroll clerk review employee <br />mileage reimbursement requests; however, this review is not evidenced on the actual <br />reimbursement forms. <br /> <br />2. The City Administrator and the City Finance Director were not allowed to provide any <br />less or different support for their mileage reimbursement requests than that required of <br />other employees, and they were prepared according to City policy. <br /> <br />3. The November 30, 2005, City Council meeting minutes indicate that the City Council <br />approved City employees who are union members and already receiving a $350 per year <br />clothing allowance will continue to receive that amount, and the non-union City <br />employees will receive reimbursement for clothing up to $50 per year in 2005 and <br />$60 per year beginning in 2006. All clothing will have the City logo on it. <br /> <br />4. Expense reimbursement forms are not consistently signed by either the employee or a <br />supervisor. <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.