Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> about the Z & P meeting. 1 am hoping you can get a good <br /> number of folks to show up. I will not really be lobbying <br /> anyone on the committee but I assume you are doing so? At <br /> least Lilligren, who you can comer at HRC. 1 am hoping to <br /> have no problem with Barret, Scott, Barb, Sandy and Gary of <br /> course and 1 will have a brief chat with Dean Z prior to the <br /> committee meeting. I think me talking to Paul, Dan or Robert <br /> before the committee might make it worse for us if they think I <br /> really 'need' their vote gosh knows what they will want from <br /> me. Q <br />09/13/04 L.G. responds to an email from a neighborhood resident who Trial Exhibit 142a <br /> opposed Plaintiff's proposed project, stating: "I agree with <br /> you and I will advocate vociferously against the appeal on <br /> Wednesday, thanks for the e-mai1." <br />09113/04 L.G. responds to an email from a Summit House resident in Trial Exhibit 142b <br /> which she states, "1 have not changed by position and will <br /> continue to represent the many voices in opposition to the <br /> Droiect as DroDosed." <br />09113/04 L.G. emails the council members sitting on the Zoning and Trial Exhibit 145 <br /> Planning Committee (who were set to hear Plaintiff's appeal) <br /> stating, "This has become an issue of EPIC proportions in <br /> Loring basically because of the attitude, actions and behavior <br /> of Brad Hoyte, the developer, and the ability of all of the <br /> other projects (3) who have abided by the 6 story/84 feet <br /> height limit in the OR3. This developer has directly and <br /> indirectly threatened me, St. Mark's Church and members of <br /> the community in order to get us to take his side of this <br /> application." L.G. ends the email by inviting fellow Council <br /> Members to "feel free to talk with me about any of this if you <br /> have auestions Drior to Wednesdav." <br />09/14/04 L.G. responds to several emails from neighborhood residents Trial Exhibit 146 <br /> who opposed the project with a form answer in which she Trial Exhibit 147 <br /> states, "Thanks so much for sending this to all of the members Trial Exhibit 148 <br /> of the committee, I assure you I will do my best to advocate Trial Exhibit 149 <br /> af!ainst the aDDeal in committee." Trial Exhibit 150 <br />09/15/04 The Zoning and Planning Committee of the City Council Trial Exhibit 304 <br /> hears Plaintiff's appeal of the denial of its application. The <br /> Committee, by a unanimous five to zero vote (including <br /> L.G.'s vote), adoots the findings ofCPED and City Attornev. <br />09/23/04 Plaintiff exercises its option to purchase the property. <br />(est.) <br />09/24/04 The full City Council hears Plaintiff's appeal of the denial of Trial Exhibit 305 <br /> its application. The Council, by a unanimous thirteen to zero <br /> vote (including L.G.'s vote) adopts the findings of the Zoning <br /> and Planning Committee. <br />10/12/04 L.G. responds to an email from Metge, stating, "Thanks for Trial Exhibit 156b <br /> the email, as 1 might have mentioned to you when 1 received <br /> your last email on the Parc Centrale project. 1 shouldn't attend <br /> the CLPC meetings as they are outside of the official public <br /> hearing. I serve on the Zoning and Planning Committee which <br /> is a quasi judicial process. If I got involved prior to the public <br /> hearing I couldface giving up my right to vote on the issue as <br /> the information I would receive would be outside the public <br /> hearinf! Drocess. " <br />12/01104 L.G. responds to an email from a neighborhood resident who Trial Exhibit 160 <br /> opposed Plaintiffs proposed project, stating, "As you know, <br /> <br />http://www.minnlawyer.com/userfiles/pdf/Order..1020(Final).htm <br /> <br />Page 16 of 17 <br /> <br />9/17/2009 <br />