My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-14 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2009
>
2009-10-14 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2009 2:17:18 PM
Creation date
10/9/2009 2:16:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2335 ~tig"'way 36 IN <br />St. P.,ul, MN S5113 <br /> <br />Tel 651-636-4600 <br />Fax 651-636-1311 <br /> <br />www,boncstroo_com <br /> <br />October 1, 2009 <br /> <br />.. Bonestroo <br /> <br />Bob Vollhaber <br />Forest Lake Contracting <br />14777 Lake Drive <br />Forest Lake, MN 55025 <br /> <br />Re: 2009 Street Improvements <br />City of Centerville <br />Client Project No.: 2009.02 <br />Bonestroo File No.: 000616-09170-0 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Vollhaber: <br /> <br />We are in receipt of your letter dated September 29, 2009 regarding a request for a Time <br />Extension for the aforementioned project. The substantial completion date for this project was <br />September 30, 2009, per Article 4.02 of the Agreement Form. Articie 1, SC-1.01.A4S of the <br />Supplementary Conditions states: <br /> <br />The Work is considered Substantially Complete when the following have been <br />completed: <br /> <br />Restoration, Wear Course Paving, Saw and Seal Transverse Joints, and Major <br />Punch List Work. <br /> <br />Your letter requests extensions to the Substantial Completion date based on an enumerated list <br />off actors. We will address each, In the same sequence as your letter. Our responses are: <br /> <br />1. This work was addressed In Change Order #1, which clearly indicates that there was no <br />extension to the completion date associated with the change order. <br />2. We will review the accuracy of this information and the appropriateness of the extension. <br />3. We agree that there were some field changes made to accommodate resident concems. <br />We do not feel that these changes constitute 3 full days of delay since they involved only <br />small equipment and a limited crew. This work did not affect your ability to continue <br />working on other aspects of the job. <br />4. The changes made to the design of this storm sewer run did not significantly change the <br />scope of work. Furthermore, your crews did not sit idle while changes were made. They <br />were working on other work of the project in a reasonable and efficient manner. <br />Additionally, the project was not bid with the benefit of right-of-entry's promised to the <br />contractor. The work was bid with the stipulation that you construct the improvements <br />within existing easements and rights-of-way. It was your prerogative to wait for a right- <br />of -entry in order to make your work easier. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.