Laserfiche WebLink
2010 346,667 480,000 480,000 500,000 <br /> 2015 376,333 480,000 480,000 500,000 <br /> 2020 407,667 480,000 480,000 500,000 <br /> m Assumes that ISO fire flow requirement of 1,000 gpm for 4 hours does not change. <br /> A new 400,000 gallon tank is projected to be needed well before the year 2000, which is reflected <br /> in the projected total storage volume in Table 6 -8. By the summer of 1997, the peak hour storage <br /> requirements are anticipated to exceed the available 100,000 gallon storage capacity. Since the <br /> lead time for water towers is over 42 weeks, we recommend that the City proceed with <br /> construction of the proposed new tower. The City is considering the construction of a new tower <br /> and an interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes to augment its storage and fire fighting <br /> capacities. <br /> 6.5 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM <br /> The adequacy of a distribution system depends not only on the size of watermains but also on <br /> location and capacity of production, treatment, and storage facilities for the system. Watermain <br /> sizes are usually determined by fire demands, since fire demands result in much higher flows than <br /> other demands. Watermains must be sized to supply large demands locally and transfer water to <br /> areas more remote from supply and storage facilities. As Centerville grows, the maximum <br /> demands of the individual service areas will become more significant, relative to the fire demands. <br /> The Centerville water distribution system has been modeled with the CYBERNET computer <br /> model to aid in evaluating its current adequacy and to design future improvements. <br /> The evaluation of the existing watermain system was based on the American Water Works <br /> Association's Distribution Requirements for Fire Protection. The primary evaluation of <br /> watermain was made under peak hour demand conditions. The evaluation also included maximum <br /> day demand plus fire flow demand. In assessing model results, the predicted conditions for each <br /> individual watermain were evaluated in order to assess the performance of the watermain. The <br /> head loss per watermain was examined. The velocity predicted for each watermain and the head <br /> loss per 1,000 feet were also examined. Generally, watermains are considered potentially <br /> deficient, or most - limiting segments, if they are predicted to have any of the following conditions: <br /> • Velocities greater than 5 feet per second (ft/s), <br /> • Head losses greater than 10 ft/1,000 ft, or <br /> • Large- diameter pipes (16 inches or greater) having head losses greater than 3 ft/1000 ft. <br /> Watermains become limiting factors in delivering water at acceptable pressures to the extremities <br /> of the system when velocities approach 5 ft/s. As head losses in a watermain approach <br /> 10 ft/1,000 ft, a substantial loss of pressure occurs in that length of watermain. Watermains with <br /> head losses exceeding 10 ft/1,000 ft are generally a contr factor to inadequate system <br /> pressures. The ultimate test of water distribution system adequacy is the pressure at the point of <br /> delivery. <br /> CWP- 260A.080 6 -6 260 -080-25 <br />