Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Buckbee moved to close thgpublic hearing. Mr, LaMotte seconded the motion. Motion <br /> carried unanimously_ <br /> Variance Request - Matt Vesel - Table <br /> Mr. Buckbee moved to table Mr. Vesel variance request until the March Meeting.. Mr. Hanson <br /> seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously_ <br /> APPEARANCES <br /> Mari Nelson - Planning and Zoning Liaison <br /> Ms. Gaustad introduced Councilmember Mari Nelson as the Planning and Zonings Council <br /> Liaison. Chair Welk and the Commission welcomed Councilmember Nelson. <br /> Future Variance Request - Paul Wolff (6933 Sumac Court) <br /> Ms. Gaustad introduced Mr. Paul Wolf who was present to receive the Commission's guidance <br /> on pursuing the construction of an accessory building on his corner lot. Mr. Palzer explained that <br /> according to Ordinance 4 (34.05 -02 and (34.06 -1), the ordinance allows accessory buildings to be <br /> construction in a rear yard. However, an exception to the ordinance is a corner lot, which has no <br /> rear yard (two front yards and two side years). In addition, Mr. Hoeft recommended the Planning <br /> Commission conduct a public hearing for a variance request at no charge to the citizen. <br /> ACTION TTEMS <br /> Ms. Gaustad reported that Mr. Dean Johnson hoped to address the Commission prior to the <br /> March 2, meeting to give an update on proposed Ordinance #4 and Ordinance #8. Furthermore, <br /> Mr. Johnson requested to meet at a6:00 p.m. workshop. <br /> Mr. Buckbee moved to et the workshov for March 2 1999 at 6:00 ..m. Mr. Hanson se onded <br /> the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> Chair Welk concured with Mr. Buckbee's desire to maintain the R5 minimal lot size of 17,500 sq. <br /> ft. Mr. Buckbee added although the wetlands are an issue, the R5 lends to the area and is keeping <br /> with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Mr. LaMotte explained that the town home concept is selling well and Centerville seniors are <br /> looking for this living option. Moreover, the PUD is fine but if the density was decreased slightly <br /> it may be more marketable. Mr. Buckbee commented the density is too high. Mr. Hanson <br /> commented granting variances for the small rear yards or a short driveway may present future <br /> 3 <br />