Laserfiche WebLink
❑ Points would be earned from the actual voting process. This process <br /> would be done by a ranking system. If you have five nominees you <br /> would rank them from 1 -5 with 5 being the top score. The number of <br /> nominees would determine the number of points used for this process. <br /> The ranking system would make certain that everyone has a vote. <br /> Example: Nominees Highest Ranking Possible 5 <br /> Jane Doe 4 points <br /> John Jones 3 points fee <br /> Sam Sails 1 points V nN' <br /> Fran Fan 2 points ,, II <br /> Ted Red 5 points (/ Ri e <br /> � <br /> The ballots would be totaled: 1 `)(, Le (// ( <br /> l` ( S <br /> Example: ^ ,�1/ � <br /> Nu /� <br /> 2 <br /> L X 4 <br /> Jane Doe Ballot votes j u R 60 points <br /> Johns Jones Ballot votes G 40 points D CY <br /> Sam Sails Ballot votes ` 100 points Z <br /> Fran Fan Ballot votes 85 points , c, 1 ev - L <br /> Ted Red Ballot votes 123 points <br /> The nominee receiving the most votes would be awarded the award. We <br /> would also like to see recognition certificates presented to the next two <br /> highest vote recipients. <br /> We would like to see all nominees publicly recognized and thanked. ;� <br /> y <br /> Whether that be through a council meeting, article in city newsletter or 1, ,V <br /> article in local newspapers. � \ U <br /> C <br /> CY e DC members feel the losers may not want to be recognized so 0 <br /> publicl. Another option may be to do a letter of recognition signed by <br /> ity Council members and leave it at that. <br /> This process we feel would be a better system and would give residents <br /> and business credit for what they have accomplished as well as <br /> increasing the voting process with more voters involved. <br /> In the event of a tie we believe it would be better to give out two awards <br /> rather than try to break a tie by a draw or other means. <br />