1999-05-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning & Zolling 4, 1999 The Commission explained the neighboring property owner was granted a variance due to the fact that them was no garage oirsite.. Alscr, whet plupeityowners enjoy tights that are not shared by the neighboring property. ThG Cunnnissiulr discussed: Ordinance #4 Seldiuu. 65:03-1 Special conditiuus and circumstua es exist are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the dl.tiunsof the petitioner. The Commission discussed: * Possible safetyhazards *- Dilapidated buildings may be - onthe recently adopted housing code. Ms. Linda Vickers witnessed wncro „ raboutnon= conforming and,the tabling of similar types of items. Ms. Broussard Vickers suggested to table until after Ordinance 44 is established. Muliuu by Linda Broussard Vickers, sewndell by LaMatte to table this until the Commission completes the research on Ordinance #4. Motion carried unanimously. y1 1 11GI 141011, 1.1E4q,1y - "t Iu Y111R' r:iIIu In tlia]KII/II &Y • 1 I The Commission discussed, in great depth, any way to grant the variance in conjunction with Ordinance-#4, Section: 65.03 -1 65.0 -2 65.0 65:03 -4 Mr. Palzer when the Commission Iewlitea Ordinance #4: Signs, that the provision should be considered for properties contiguous to County Roads. ' The-Commission suggested -Staff 111v4ww c the and easement The Commission felt safer having the sign installed closer to Main Street. Furthermore, the sign ordinance will need to be -in- orderto concerns. Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Brain Hanson to table the Centennial School District's variance request to- installea - sign based onthefacttbat it does not conform to the variance standards, and to update the sign ordinance in an attempt to re- address-therequest the future: - Motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 4