Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. March suggested that Royal Oaks approach_ Anoka_ County access onto 213 Avenue " Mr. Black <br /> did not believe there will be a problem - receiving county access authorization limited <br /> generated traffic. Mr. March confirmed Mayor Wilharber's questions pertaining to the road construction <br /> and easements be required prior to ofthe north inupetiy uwne& by6erald <br /> Rehbein. <br /> Motion - by Councilmember Sweeney, seconded -by-Councilmember Travis to-closethe <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Deer Rezone - PUD / Preliminary Plat <br /> Mr. Gerald Rehbein (R & R Leasing) updated the Council on Deer Pass and requested approval of <br /> a R2 PUD/Preliminary Plat approval. There are -15 -lots in- a-variety of sizes, and- the - housing <br /> structures will comply with the R5 requirements. <br /> Mayor - Wilharber opened discussiontcrthe £ ounciL Councilmember Brennerconfirmed <br /> Wetland area and suggested the area be accessible by all citizens not just the homes built on adjacent <br /> property. Councilmember Bi ennui questioned ifthe- developer planned to pave as perPark and <br /> Recreation's recommendation. Mr. March noted that the City has found it to be beneficial to have the <br /> developer pave trials instead ofthe -City completingthe <br /> Mr. Peterson mentioned that an oversized pipe will be installed, anticipating the development of the <br /> north property- Mr. Peterson , jfi.. ed to - a-memo-from Jeff- McDowell in regards to the- water-main-(See <br /> attached). <br /> Ms. IennifeLSteward ( 1995- 73_` housetand the lots will comply_ withibe R5 <br /> zoning dish it.t. Mr. Rehbein noted the homct are plamred be constructed - hraccul dame with the <br /> R5 standards but some of the lots are less than the R5 lot required size. <br /> Mr: Palzer noted the Council that Old; uax t4 requires-a-35i front yard setback and MrRehbei is <br /> requesting a 25' set back. <br /> Mr. Rod34enslin:( 3967 -73 Street) stated chat totst,Z_I and 4 are at or heinw the R2 #evel_of zoning <br /> requirements. - And, lots 10, 11, 1-2, 1-5,and 16meetthe The bulk ofthe <br /> size which is inappropriate. The Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan explain the minimal requirements'' <br /> and not lower its standards any- developer. The street width - has - been reduced-from <br /> 35' to 24'. Mr. Henslin discussed the wetland layout and urged the Council not to allow drainage onto <br /> the south property line. Mr. Rehbein-explained allows 30,000-situate feet of wetlaua to be <br /> filled in without obtaining a national permit, which takes six months. <br /> Mr. Henslin suggested beautification - area, assistdrainageand help to-negate-drainage econcerns <br /> for lot 4. Lot 4, drainage can vary from 908 to 909 and may prove to be a problem lot. Furthermore, <br /> the developer may want to take advau tageof the wetlandsand the Wier. Mr. Peterson <br /> said that he met with Mr. Henslin at the site and additional drainage or excavating of the site will <br /> require a national permit. <br /> Mr. Brian Patterson (1975-73'Street) questionedthe difference between lot - size - and - the mrmber <br /> of lots in the Woods of Clearwater Creek- and - proposed Deer Pass Development: Mr. Rehbein -said that <br /> all developments are driven by the property and the plan supports the natural surroundings. <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br />