Laserfiche WebLink
should be tabled to provide time to ponder the issue. <br /> Ms. Broussard- Vickers moved and it was seconded to table the <br /> variance request. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Chair Welk suggested Staff consult with the legal council on <br /> converting a garage into an office or another purpose, and if a <br /> garage is required of existing homes. <br /> Mr. Buckbee and Ms. Broussard- Vickers agreed to develop a list of <br /> "What if questions" for legal council consideration. <br /> Pr•posed Special Use Permit - Performance Automotive <br /> Broussard - Vickers moved and it was seconded to recommend the City <br /> Council grant approval of the special use permit for Performance <br /> Automotive, as provided in the ordinance to conduct business at <br /> the current location. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Chair Welk entertained seeking legal advice before proceeding. <br /> The Commission discussed ordinance 44 -A and its current language. <br /> Mr. Buckbee felt the existing ordinance allows 2X6 construction. <br /> Chair Welk recalled the intent of the past ordinance amendment <br /> was to require masonry brick buildings in the Commercial and <br /> Industrial districts. Chair Welk expressed her concerns and <br /> suggested that the issue be tabled while Staff seeks legal <br /> councils' interpretation of the stated ordinance. Ms. Broussard - <br /> Vickers quoted the present ordinance and felt the Planning <br /> Commissions responsibility is to enforce the current ordinance. <br /> The Planning Commission anatomized ordinance 44 -A in the past and <br /> present form. Accordingly, the Commission elected to forward the <br /> Council the following recommendations. <br /> Ms. Broussard - Vickers moved and it was seconded to recommend the <br /> Council approve construction made for this site since it meets <br /> with the current ordinance. And, the Commission felt the Council <br /> has just cause to change ordinance 44 -A; denying wood frame <br /> buildings in the Commercial and Industrial Districts. However, <br /> because the applicant had initial contact with the Planning and <br /> Zoning Commission, the above - mentioned recommendation is made <br /> (approve construction made for this site since it meets with the <br /> current ordinance). Furthermore, the Planning Commission has <br /> concern denying the application since the applicant made contact <br /> with the Planning Commission prior to the Council imposing <br /> ordinance 44 -A amendment. Chair Welk aye, Vermeulen aye, <br /> Broussard - Vickers aye, Buckbee aye, LaMotte abstained. Motion <br /> carried. <br /> 5 <br />