Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> For the record, Mr. March quoted ordinance 32.01 HOME <br /> OCCUPATIONS. A home occupation may be conducted only in <br /> accordance with the following requirements: <br /> 32.01 -1 SUBORDINATE USE. The use of the property for the <br /> home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate o <br /> its residential use. <br /> 32.01 -2 EMPLOYEES. The home occupation shall be carried on by <br /> a member of the family residing on the property with not more <br /> than one employee who is not part of the family. <br /> 32.01-3 SID <br /> OUT E APPEARANCE. C of the hom o <br /> shall result in no chance in the outside appearance of the <br /> building or land, or other visible evidence of the conduct of the <br /> home occupation Exterior displays or signs other than those <br /> permitted under the ordinance. <br /> 32_.01 -3 SALES PROHIBITED. No sale of any goods or m r <br /> ate ials <br /> not produced on the premisses shall be made in connection with <br /> the home occupation. <br /> 32.01 -5 TRAFFIC. No traffic shall be ggenerated by such home <br /> occupation in greater volume than normally be expected in a <br /> residential neighborhood, and any need for parking generated by <br /> the conduct of such home occupation shall be met off the street <br /> and other than in a regpired front yard. <br /> Dr. Schlavin felt the "U" shaped drive way would lend to the <br /> business by reducing traffic congestion. <br /> Mr. March commented the location in question does not reflect a <br /> normal residential district. Mr. March added, City Hall /Fire <br /> Department is located next door to the property and a fleet of <br /> security cars are directly across County Road 14. Mr. March <br /> added, the facility is on an unusually large lot. <br /> Ms. Broussard - Vickers stated based on ordinance 32.01 -3 OUTSIDE <br /> APPEARANCE - the outside structure would be altered exclusively <br /> for the purpose of a home business, which is prohibited. In her <br /> opinion, the Commissions responsibility is to enforce the present <br /> ordinances. Therefore, Ms. Broussard- Vickers does not favor <br /> approving the variance request. <br /> Mr. Buckbee disagreed with government dictating what a property <br /> owner can and cannot do with a garage. <br /> Mr. Buckbee moved and it was seconded to close the variance <br /> 2 <br />