Laserfiche WebLink
32.01 -1 SUBORDINATE TJSE. The use of the property for the <br /> .m- • i.• h.l .- 1-. in i.- ._ _n. •• • . - • <br /> its residential use. <br /> 32.01 -2 EMPLOYEES. The home occupation shall he carried on by <br /> a member of the family re.i in on the property with not more <br /> than one employee who is not part of the family <br /> 32.01 -3 OUTSIDE APPEARANCE. Conduct of the home occupation <br /> shall result in no change in the outside appearance of the <br /> building or land or o h r vi ibl vid n of th conduc of the <br /> home occupation Exterior display, or signs other than those <br /> permitted under the ordinance. <br /> 37.01-3 L P ROHIBI .D. No sale of any goods or materials <br /> not prod d on the premisses shall be made in connection with <br /> the home occupation. <br /> 32.01 - TRAFFIC. No traffic shall be generated by su home <br /> occupation in greater volume than normally he expected in a <br /> residential neighborhood and any need for parking generated by <br /> the conduct of such home occupation shall he met off the street <br /> and other than in a required front yard. <br /> Dr. Schlavin felt the "U" shaped drive way would lend to the <br /> business by reducing traffic congestion. <br /> Mr. March commented the location in question does not reflect a <br /> normal residential district. Mr. March added, City Hall /Fire <br /> Department is located next door to the property and a fleet of <br /> security cars are directly across County Road 14. Mr. March <br /> added, the facility is on an unusually large lot. <br /> Ms. Broussard- Vickers arrived at 7:45 p.m. <br /> Ms. Broussard- Vickers stated based on ordinance 32.01 -3 OUTSIDE <br /> APPEARANC& - the outside structure would be altered exclusively <br /> for the purpose of a home business, which is prohibited. In her <br /> opinion, the Commissions responsibility is to enforce the present <br /> ordinances. Therefore, Ms. Broussard- Vickers does not favor <br /> approving the variance request. <br /> Mr. Buckbee disagreed with government dictating what a property <br /> owner can and cannot do with a garage. <br /> Mr. Buckbee moved and it was seconded to close the variance <br /> public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.' <br /> 2 <br />