My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-08-04 Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
1998
>
1998-08-04 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2009 3:56:30 PM
Creation date
12/21/2009 3:55:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Welk suggested Staff consult with the legal council on <br /> converting a garage into an office or another purpose, and if a <br /> garage is required of existing homes. <br /> Mr. Buckbee and Ms. Broussard- Vickers agreed to develop a, list of <br /> "What if questions" for legal council consideration. <br /> Proposed Special Use Permit - Performance Automotive <br /> Broussard - Vickers moved and it was seconded to recommend the City <br /> Council grant approval of the special use permit for Performance <br /> Automotive, as provided in the ordinance to conduct business at <br /> the current location. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Chair Welk entertained seeking legal advice before proceeding. <br /> The Commission discussed ordinance 44 -A and its current language. <br /> Mr. Buckbee felt the existing ordinance allows 2X6 construction. <br /> Chair Welk recalled the intent of the past ordinance amendment <br /> was to require masonry brick buildings in the Commercial and <br /> Industrial districts. Chair Welk expressed her concerns and <br /> suggested that the issue be tabled while Staff seeks legal <br /> councils' interpretation of the stated ordinance. Ms. Broussard- <br /> Vickers quoted the present ordinance and felt the Planning <br /> Commissions responsibility is to enforce the current ordinance. <br /> The Planning Commission anatomized ordinance 44 -A in the past and <br /> present form. Accordingly, the Commission elected to forward the <br /> Council the following recommendations. <br /> Ms. Broussard - Vickers moved and it was seconded to recommend to <br /> the Council to approve construction made for this site, since it <br /> meets with the current ordinance. And, the Commission felt the <br /> Council has just cause to change ordinance 44 -A; denying wood <br /> frame buildings in the Commercial and Industrial Districts. <br /> However, because the applicant had initial contact with the <br /> Planning and Zoning Commission, the above- mentioned <br /> recommendation is made (approve construction made for this site <br /> since it meets with the current ordinance). Furthermore, the <br /> Planning Commission has concern denying the application since the <br /> applicant made contact with the Planning Commission prior to the <br /> Council imposing ordinance 44 -A amendment. Chair Welk aye, <br /> Vermeulen aye, Broussard - Vickers aye, Buckbee aye, LaMotte <br /> abstained. Motion carried. <br /> Proposed Tobacco Ordinance #66 <br /> Ms. Broussard- Vickers moved and it was seconded to forward <br /> tobacco ordinance #66 to the City Council; Apply appropriate <br /> numbering and strike in its entirety, Tobacco Ordinance 66.13 <br /> Penalties. Subd. 3 Minors. (Minors found in unlawful possession <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.