My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-11-10 Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
1998
>
1998-11-10 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2009 7:54:48 AM
Creation date
12/22/2009 7:54:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
w.•- •' ..sal f.ilitie .m.. wi h h- •r.vi i• of <br /> this Ordinance and have road access both to the subdivision and <br /> to the individual building sites no lower than one foot below the <br /> 1. • Fi... • - i•. 1 -v. i.e. " <br /> Mr. Palzer added, a property owner can fill the flood plain, but <br /> not in the floodway. In addition, each proposed property must <br /> have a buildable site, in the case reconstruction is needed. If <br /> the current building is 51% destroyed, the proposed lot must have <br /> an area outside of the flood way to build another building. The <br /> city cannot issue a building permit to reconstruct the existing <br /> building if it is destroyed by 51% or more. <br /> Chair Welk confirmed the existing building is in the flood way. <br /> Public Hearing closed at 7:20 p.m. <br /> Mr. Palzer noted city ordinances require new structures be two <br /> feet above flood plain elevations. Mr. March said the legal <br /> council noted the subdivision can be approved with an approved <br /> variance. <br /> Mr. Buckbee questioned Staff if the business owner considered <br /> purchasing parcel "A" with parcel "B." Ms. Green replied selling <br /> the property as a whole is too financially restricting for the <br /> proposed business owner at this time. <br /> Gerald Rehbein - MUSA Swap <br /> Mr. March gave a brief overview of the different MUSA dedicated <br /> phases and he noted the request to relocate MUSA from the <br /> property on the north east corner of the city to the property <br /> located south of Main Street and west of 20th Avenue. Also, Mr. <br /> March updated the Commission on the City's Comprehensive Plan and <br /> its MUSA designation areas. Mr. March added, the proposed MUSA <br /> Swap would afford the city and property owner to develop the <br /> strip of land along 20th Avenue. Also, the proposed property is <br /> not slated for MUSA until year 2001. <br /> Chair Welk inquired about comments from the Metropolitan Council. <br /> Mr. March commented the best way to address the MUSA shortage on <br /> 20th Avenue is to switch the MUSA properties. <br /> Councilmember Helmbrecht questioned Mr. March about requesting a <br /> Comprehensive Plan amendment from the Metropolitan Council. Mr. <br /> March replied the City is not required to file a formal <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment. However, the City will need to <br /> inform the Council that a "House Keeping Amendment" will need to <br /> be completed. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.