Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Wilharber indicated he drove through the City at night and found that <br /> buildings and homes with lights on the exterior do provide more light on the street <br /> and said having lights on the townhome exteriors may be an idea to solve the <br /> problem. He also indicated the City would be willing to look at the lighting issue <br /> but said he is concerned for continued operating costs. <br /> Mr. March noted with the development of the outlot areas the City would have <br /> leverage to assess the developer for more lights. <br /> A member of the audience, who is a member of the Association, said when they <br /> drive around the curves in the development their headlights go one way and they <br /> are looking the other way into the dark. She said she has almost hit people <br /> because people are walking in the street because the sidewalks are not clear. She <br /> also indicated a desire for a security light at the park and said she believes the <br /> light at the park should be the City's responsibility. Mr. March noted people in <br /> this community are out alot walking and biking and even though there are <br /> sidewalks provided alot of people do walk in the streets. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated a desire to have the ongoing clean- <br /> up of construction debris added to the Development Agreement. She said a silt <br /> fencing requirement has been added already and indicated the sodding or soil <br /> replacement should be inspected and if done incorrectly, it should be re -done at <br /> the developer's expense. She also said the issues of Eagle Park need to be <br /> forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Department. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers then asked if the developer can force the <br /> Association to take on new members by developing the outlots. Mr. Hoeft <br /> declined to comment as he has not read the Development Agreement. <br /> Mr. Halstrom explained the by -laws of the Association say the developer can add <br /> up to sixty-seven (67) units. He explained the private road will expand and add <br /> eight (8) more units than allowed in the by -laws. The current plan from Swift <br /> Construction shows twenty (20) units and the by -laws state eighteen (18) are <br /> allowed. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the developer came to the Council <br /> with a plan for a certain number of houses if the City could deny the request if the <br /> Association provides the Council with something that proves the developer is at <br /> fault. She then indicated if the Association has nothing to prevent the <br /> development it may be a civil issue between the developer and the Association. <br /> City Attorney Hoeft stated he could not comment on the developer's plans <br /> because there is not an approved plan. He then indicated the developer could <br /> create a new association or create some thing with the existing Association if it is <br /> not in violation of the by -laws or Development Agreement. He indicated the plan <br /> 1 <br /> Page 9 of 22 <br />