My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-09-13 Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2000
>
2000-09-13 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2009 2:12:32 PM
Creation date
12/22/2009 2:11:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. Our homeowners are generally proud of our individual units and with the ultimate <br /> vision of our completed development. However, our issues and concerns with the developer <br /> (Gor -em, LLC) and contractor (Swift Construction) relative to on -going site construction in the <br /> development have existed since the first unit was occupied in 1997. Most of our issues and <br /> concern are covered by existing city ordinance and agreement with the developer (references <br /> la and lb above) and can be resolved by the city simply enforcing the same. These issues and <br /> concerns, most of which are addressed by references lc and Id above, include the following: <br /> Id) Regular Sweeping of Streets and Sidewalks throughout the development. <br /> This is required periodically by agreement between the city and the developer, and until very <br /> recently, has not been done. This should be enforced by routine inspections of the development <br /> by the city. <br /> Ongoing Pick -up of Construction Debris. Construction sites and open lots <br /> in the development are often littered with construction debris and material. If not already <br /> provided for, the city should require daily cleanup of construction sites by the contractor, and <br /> removal of such material as pallets, concrete blocks, bricks, etc., when they are no longer <br /> needed. Other cities require such daily site maintenance. Centerville should do the same. <br /> K Regular Maintenance and Control of Weeds in undeveloped lots and along <br /> sidewalks. This is required by agreement between the city and the developer, and until very <br /> recently, has not been done. This should be enforced by routine inspections of the development <br /> by the city. i <br /> Silt Fencing at Construction Sites. If not already provided for, the city <br /> should require silt fencing at all unit construction sites and undeveloped lots to inhibit the <br /> erosion of soil onto the streets. Other cities require such fencing, and Centerville should do the <br /> same. <br /> i nspection of Site Grading and Sodding Practices. The agreement at <br /> reference lb provides for four inches of comparable soil being emplaced prior to sodding. This <br /> has never been done in our development. Sod is routinely placed over weeds, rocks, utility flags, <br /> etc. Our grounds maintenance crew has never seen the likes of the inadequate grading and <br /> sodding that exist in our development. The city should enforce this requirement as part of its' <br /> routine building inspection procedures during unit construction, to insure both the required <br /> proper grading and sodding topsoil. <br /> C leaning of Storm Sewer Grills. Construction debris and weeds often block <br /> ( $( <br /> these grills. They should be monitored by routine inspections of the development by the city and <br /> remedied by the contractor when required. <br /> -2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.