Laserfiche WebLink
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the unit could be moved ten (10) feet <br /> away from the property line. Mr. Palzer stated the unit is currently three (3) feet <br /> from the property line and could not be on the other side of the trail as it is private <br /> property. <br /> Mayor Wilharber inquired if the unit could be placed near the sidewalk to remain <br /> accessible and placed on a slab. He stated an enclosure could be built at a later <br /> date. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she would like to see this cha made <br /> as the accessory structure is closer than five (5) feet to the property line. <br /> Mr. Palzer noted the unit could be moved to the suggested location. <br /> Council Member Travis noted he would not be voting on this issue because he felt <br /> the movement would be opening a can of worms for other property owners near <br /> parks. <br /> Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council <br /> Member Nelson to approve the movement of the satellite in Eagle Park to be <br /> ten (10) feet from the property line as stated within Ordinance #4 for <br /> accessory structures. All in favor. Motion carried. (Sweeney opposed) <br /> (Travis abstained). <br /> VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> Nnnter'c Crnccing Tlitrh — Tabled Tilly 76 and August 9. 2000 <br /> Mr. Hoeft addressed the Council and stated the Title Company wanted to <br /> exchange some deeds for the northerly plats. He stated the City did receive an <br /> easement for the ditch and the entire waterway was within City property. <br /> Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson <br /> to authorize the City Administrator to execute the quit claim deeds if all land <br /> is within the City easement or City owned property for Hunter's Crossing <br /> Ditch. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Ordinance #4 <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers noted she would like an update on how <br /> grand- fathering worked with items not in compliance with the Ordinance. Mr. <br /> Hoeft stated he would address all future items as they arose. He noted an <br /> amortization could be placed on non - conforming uses to gain compliance over a <br /> number of years if the Council so desired. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the dump truck issue would be <br /> handled. Mr. Hoeft indicated a letter would be sent out to the homeowner <br /> requesting compliance and allowing a reasonable amount of time for compliance. <br /> 4 <br />