My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-11-08 Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2000
>
2000-11-08 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2009 8:08:06 AM
Creation date
12/23/2009 8:04:54 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
any system. TETRA is in use throughout the world except North America, with many systems <br /> fully operational. Pricing for infrastructure and for subscriber radio equipment is relatively low, <br /> with top of the line mobile and portable radios reportably priced around $800.00 primarily due to <br /> intense competition and high volume production. <br /> Introduction of TETRA radio equipment in the United States has been delayed apparently for <br /> two reasons. The first of those reasons is that Motorola holds certain U.S. patents with rights <br /> needed to that intellectual information before TETRA radios can be sold in this country. <br /> Motorola has so far been unwilling to negotiate rights to that technology, however, it is believed <br /> that Motorola will give rights in trade for other rights to other intellectual property that Motorola <br /> desires. <br /> The second reason is that there may be a problem with FCC rules in regard to radio electrical <br /> characteristics for which a waiver is needed and the FCC has yet to consider that issue. <br /> Operation in the simulcast mode is not possible with TETRA and therefore TETRA is an <br /> inefficient frequency user in a system like that needed in the Minneapolis -St. Paul region. It is <br /> possible that there may not be enough frequencies to build a TETRA system in this metropolitan <br /> region. <br /> Costs to implement a TETRA system in Anoka County are unknown, however, a relatively <br /> expensive infrastructure will be needed that will probably result in costs similar to the two <br /> 800 MHz alternatives described in this report. <br /> TETRA will also mean that the ability to intercommunicate with land mobile radio users in non- <br /> TETRA systems will be difficult and expensive to accomplish. <br /> There is a memorandum of understanding signed by four of the European manufacturers of <br /> TETRA equipment that is used to coordinate their activities related to the introduction of <br /> TETRA technology to the United States and Canada. That group of manufacturers has promised <br /> to provide Anoka County with a pro forma TETRA system design with pricing for a stand alone <br /> TETRA system serving the county. As of this writing, that design and pricing has not been <br /> delivered. <br /> 3.4 COST ESTIMATES FOR ALTERNATIVES <br /> 3.4.1 Cost Estimates for Items that are Independent of Radio System Alternative Selected <br /> Some items are needed regardless of the radio system alternative selected. They are mobile radio <br /> installation, fire radio paging improvements, backup dispatch facility and equipment, test <br /> equipment and training, and more law enforcement dispatch center radio operator personnel. <br /> Cost estimates for each of those items is discussed in this section of this report. <br /> Ronald Vegemast Engineering, Inc. -27- Report: Anoka County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.