Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Meeting of June 24, 1999 Page 20 <br /> Resolution No. 99 -184, Granting a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to Reduce the Side Yard Setback <br /> from 50 Feet to 36 Feet, Moharram and Karen Akbari, 3300 Rodeo Drive NE, (Case File No. 99- 41 /LST) <br /> Action 99 -337 (Al 11.6) <br /> Moved by Councilmember Rose, seconded by Councilmember Daniels, that Resolution No. 99 -184, <br /> "Granting a Conditional Use Permit Amendment Per Section 27.04 of the Zoning Code of the City of Blaine, <br /> Moharram and Karen Akbari, 3300 Rodeo Drive NE," be approved. <br /> The Community Development Director stated the applicant was requesting, under the DF (Development <br /> Flex) zoning, an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit which would allow the construction of a new <br /> home with a 36 -foot side yard building setback on both sides of the home rather than the 50 foot side yard <br /> setback generally envisioned. The applicant was proposing to construct a home of approximately 2,535 <br /> square feet with a footprint width of approximately 77 feet. Given the lot width of 198 feet at the front edge <br /> of the site and the lot's tapered dimensions, the required 50 -foot side yard setbacks were not practical for <br /> the type of upper scale home expected in the North Oaks West development was to be constructed on this <br /> lot. The front of the lot was lower and contained some wetlands that pushed the home farther back onto the <br /> lot. The Community Development Director noted another unresolved issue was the location of the septic <br /> system that the property owner can address tonight. <br /> Moharram Akbari, applicant and buyer of the property, stated he selected this lot because of the large size <br /> and wetland areas. He stated they have no choice on the location due to the impact to trees and need for <br /> fill. He stated they spoke with a septic system designer about the size and location and there were no <br /> options but to build the house in this location. <br /> Craig Fisher, 3250 Rodeo Drive, stated he had questions about the difference between a variance and <br /> conditional use permit amendment. He stated that with a conditional use permit a hardship was not needed <br /> and he was concerned about the integrity of the entire area. He noted the original setback was 50 feet. Mr. <br /> Fisher stated that his back yard will lose its privacy and his house may not be salable. He stated another <br /> concern was that there was a purpose for the original requirements and they should not be compromised. <br /> He suggested the applicant be required to find an altemative even if it required additional fill. Mr. Fisher <br /> urged the Council to take a stand and not compromise these requirements by approving this request. He <br /> noted the size of the house and large (42 feet long) garage being proposed. He asked if the consideration <br /> was to increase the tax base or uphold the requirements. <br /> The Community Development Director stated the 50 foot setback requirement was part of the Development <br /> Flex zoning so to change the setback, the development plan, which was established through a conditional <br /> use permit, must be amended. <br /> Mayor Ryan noted the key was where the percolation tests identified the best location for the septic system. <br /> Mr. Akbari stated the side elevation contained only one window and they may reduce the size of the <br /> attached garage from a four -car to a three -car garage if they were allowed to construct a detached double <br /> garage at a later date. He noted this was not the first time the Council had considered such an amendment. <br /> He asserted that they were not asking for something unusual that had not been granted to others. <br /> The Community Development Director stated he was not able to indicate whether a detached garage could <br /> be constructed in the rear lot. <br /> Councilmember Clark stated he would not support the variance because going from a four -car garage to a <br /> three -car garage was not a hardship consideration, but a luxury. <br />