Laserfiche WebLink
2. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would <br /> deprive the petitioner of' rights commonly enjoyed by other <br /> properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. <br /> 3. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant <br /> and special privilege as denied by this ordinance or to other lands, <br /> structures or buildings in the same district. <br /> 4. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of' light <br /> in the air of the adjacent property, unreasonably diminish or impair <br /> established property values within the surrounding area or in any <br /> other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the <br /> residents of the City. <br /> The Chair requested comment on each individual criterion. Brief comments took place <br /> that the property and existing building met the existing Ordinance #4 criteria for <br /> requesting a Variance and consensus was to approve DCS Properties' Variance request. <br /> Motion by Member Kilian, and seconded by Member Brainard to close the Public <br /> Hearing. Members DeVine and Sheppard Abstained. Motion carried. <br /> Motion by Chair Hanson, and seconded by Member DeVine to oven the Public Hearing <br /> for consideration of Richard S. Carlson & Associates request to Re- classify the MUSA in <br /> regards to the Hunter's Crossing Addition. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. March reported that the developer of Hunter's Crossing (Mr. Richard S. Carlson & <br /> Associates) is requesting that the property lying southward of LaMotte Park (previously <br /> owned Pracher and Bauman properties) be allowed to be developed in the year 2000 <br /> instead of the proposed 2001 development quadrant contained in the City's <br /> Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Carlson has proposed to provide the City with an additional <br /> $500/lot (37 lots) in Park Dedication Fees. Mr. March reiterated that the Commission's <br /> consideration of the MUSA Re- classification and any action made by same should be <br /> conditioned upon three other entity's approval besides the City's; the City of Lino Lakes, <br /> Anoka County and the Metropolitan Council. Mr. March also stated that Mr. Carlson <br /> must come before the Commission again to request Final Plat Approval. <br /> The Commission questioned if the City's Engineer and Mr. Palzer (Building <br /> Official/Public Works) had reviewed the presented material. Mr. March stated that both <br /> had reviewed. <br /> Motion by Member Devine, seconded by Chair Hanson to close the Public Hearing for <br /> consideration of Richard S. Carlson & Associates request to Re- classify the MUSA in <br /> regards to the Hunter's Crossing Addition. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion by Member DeVine, seconded by Member McLean to recommend avvroval and <br /> forward Richard S. Carlson & Associates request to Re- classify the MUSA (Amend the <br /> City's Comprehensive Plan)in regards to the Hunter's Crossing Development, contingent <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />