My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-08-06 Minutes
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
1985-08-06 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2010 1:34:21 PM
Creation date
1/4/2010 1:34:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LAW OFFICES OF <br /> Burke and }Hawkins <br /> SUITE 10? <br /> 299 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD <br /> JOHN M. BURKE COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433 <br /> WILLIAM G. HAWKINS <br /> PHONE (6121 7844998 <br /> THOMAS M. FITZPATRICK <br /> July 31, 1985 <br /> Debra Gonsior, Clerk <br /> Centerville City Hall <br /> 1694 Sorel Street <br /> Centerville, MN 55038 <br /> Re: Animal Ordinance <br /> Dear Debbie: <br /> I have had a chance to review the proposed animal ordinance and <br /> offer the following comments: <br /> Under Section 1 there is a subsection which is entitled <br /> ORDINANCE TO. I don't understand the heading and believe that <br /> this should be removed as well as Subdivision 1.15 which should <br /> be placed in another section of the ordinance. Section 1 for <br /> intent should include Subdivisions 1.21, 1.22, and 1.23. <br /> Subdivision 1.15 and Subdivision 1.10 really are substantive <br /> provisions and should not fall within the intent section which <br /> merely is a general policy statement of the purpose of the <br /> ordinance. I believe that I would put Sections 1.10 and 1.15 <br /> under Section 3 defined as Nuisances. <br /> Under Section 2, it is not clear to me what is the intent of <br /> this Section 2.5. It appears that a parcel of land is defined <br /> as any contiguous property that has a size of at least two and <br /> one -half acres with a dwelling located on it. I don't <br /> understand what difference it makes whether it is under one <br /> title or more than one title. The present language would mean <br /> that all property whether under one title or more would be <br /> considered a parcel of land. <br /> Under Section 4, Penalties for Noncompliance, I would merely <br /> make that read that "shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor as <br /> defined by state law." I don't believe there is any need to <br /> talk about imprisonment or the fine since that may change over <br /> the years and we want to have our ordinance reflect the current <br /> penalty for violation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.