Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Meeting Minutes of November 14, 1995 <br /> First, need Greg Hellings to give a clarification on what will happen with Waterworks and <br /> if distance is changed from 350 feet to 500 feet. <br /> MOTION by Vermeulen, second by LaMotte to table the Adult Ordinance until the <br /> information is obtained from the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Tourville stated that this has been a long process to adopt this ordinance but it is in the <br /> best interest of the city that they review all their options. <br /> WF,ED ORDINANCL <br /> Tourville agreed with the Council's recommendation of separating residential from <br /> industrial, etc. He feels that farmland should not be held at the same limitations as <br /> residential. He also added that if lot become an eye -sore they become a dumping spot for <br /> people for grassing clippings, garbage, etc. <br /> Welk stated the lot next to Tom Thumb looks better when it is not mowed. But the <br /> cleared lots in developments should be kept up. <br /> Vermeulen questioned if there was a problem in the city currently and can see separating <br /> residential and farmland. But doesn't see a problem with the current ordinance. <br /> Tourville stated that an add should be put in the paper or newsletter regarding noxious <br /> weeds and the need for them to be cut. <br /> Vermeulen stated that sections 1, 2, and 3 are spelled out clearly and when this ordinance <br /> was discussed at a previous meeting P &Z each section was looked at in detail. And P &Z <br /> made it more lenient by recommending a I2" growth instead of an 8 inches. <br /> Tourville talked about the nuisance and seeding requirements that are covered in <br /> Ordinance 8 for lots under development. <br /> MOTION by Vermeulen, second by Welk to leave Ordinance 54 as previously <br /> recommended, only changing the growth height to 12 inches. Motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> DITTIMING DFSIGN ORDINANCE 444 <br /> This item was tabled at previous meetings. During the last discussion it was mentioned <br /> that a public hearing should be held to get input from current and interested businesses on <br /> building types in the industrial and commercial zones. This public hearing will also <br /> provide the wording they may want to use in the ordinance. Welk added that there was <br /> previous consensus to have concrete permanent structures in the city. <br /> PZ11- 14M.WPS 3 <br />