1994-07-05 Public Hearing - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P & Z Meeting Minutes October 3, 1989 Page Four street. Any new building must comply with the setbacks. Chairman Tourville expressed that the street can only go to the east, and can not be widened because of the buildings. He also felt that the ordinance was stretched to the limit in 1986, and ! that they still could build on the lot but would need another design. Gunnar Pettersen,. Building Inspector,. stated that the buildings were all in line with the other ones, and suggests a 24x40x42 split entry would be feasible_ I1 ot ' ion by Welk,. second by Vermsulen to recommend to the City cil to deny request for variance at 173& !lain street due- to 'itha fact then house is to large for the lot; motion previously , *denied July 1986, motion carried unanimously ~ Discussion on the proposed amendment to Ordinance *4. Chairman Tourville expressed concern on the wordage of the amendment. Motion by Permeulea, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council the adoption of Ordinance *4, Section. 32_03 -17 amendment as follows: Row Heads: L The following signs upon the securing of a special use permit, an provided in Section 64 of this ordinance for each such sign: 4' (1) Heal $state development signs maybe erected to promote a residential project of ten C10) or more: dwelling units.. Such signs will not exceed one hundred (100) square feet per side and shall be removed when the project is ninety C90) percent completed, sold or Leased. .. Is amended to read: Real Estate development signs shall be- permitted if they meet the following requirements: (1) Signs shall not be placed upon private property unless written permission is. obtained from the owner, (2) Signs shall be placed twenty five (25) feet from the curb edge, (3) Signs shall not exceed the dimensions of 6'x10',