Laserfiche WebLink
Meeting Minutes - P & Z <br /> September 4, 1990 <br /> page eight <br /> Chairman Tourville noted that the Feasibility Study is not yet <br /> available from the engineers. <br /> John Stewart, City Engineer, was present. Mr. Stewart noted that <br /> the preliminary Feasibility Study has been completed but did not <br /> feel it is appropriate to review the preliminary study without a <br /> grading plan from the developer. <br /> Chairman Tourville noted that the City Planner in their report <br /> noted seventeen items that should be addressed. It also appears <br /> to be the conclusion of the planner that this plan would be <br /> workable with some adjustments. <br /> Gerald Rehbein, developer, expressed concern over the Planner's <br /> comment that there is not enough parking. Mr. Rehbein feels that <br /> he has more parking then the City requires in the Ordinance. <br /> With the Planner's concern over the setbacks he expressed that he <br /> could bend the roads to 20th Avenue and would then be able to <br /> meet the 35' setback requirement. <br /> Mr. Stewart expressed that he is more in favor of a cul -de -sac <br /> with the emergency access than a "horse shoe ". In his opinion a <br /> "horse shoe" could create too many accesses on to the County <br /> Road. Mr. Stewart also noted that the berm needs to be adjusted <br /> as it is in the way of the emergency access. <br /> Commission member Wilharber stated that the Planner, <br /> Clerk /Administrator and City Engineer have noted a lot of issues <br /> that need to be addressed. <br /> Mr. Rehbein felt that he can not please the Planner, <br /> Clerk /Administrator or City Engineer. He is here to ask the <br /> Planning and Zoning Commission what they would like. <br /> Chairman Tourville noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission <br /> had already approved the concept, but this idea is new to <br /> Centerville and that is why they were treading slowly. <br /> Chairman Tourville felt that the purpose of a PUB is to create a <br /> little more uniqueness to a project and that the setbacks may not <br /> be a problem. <br /> Mr. Rehbein expressed that he felt that the Park and Recreation <br /> Committee should not be involved in the park land. That the <br /> people who live there should decide what they want. <br /> Liaison Burgstahler asked Mr. Rehbein which comments that have <br /> been made regarding his proposed development he did not like. <br /> it <br />