My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-10-03 Minutes
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
1989-10-03 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2010 10:29:49 AM
Creation date
1/5/2010 10:29:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning <br /> Commission held a public hearing on October 3, 1989, at City <br /> Hall. The purpose was to hear all persons present regarding the <br /> possibility of amending Ordinance #4, Section 32.03 -7 referencing <br /> real estate development signs. Chairman Tourville called the <br /> hearing to order at 7:15 p.m. Present: Welk, Drilling, <br /> Vermeulen, liaison Neumann. <br /> Chairman Tourville summarized the proposed amendment to the <br /> ordinance, questioning the wordage of the proposed amendment. He <br /> also questioned as to why the 1 1/2 years and /or 90% completion <br /> would be cause for removal of the sign, feeling that this would <br /> only deter the completion of a project. <br /> Commission member Welk and Vermeulen said that they had added <br /> this to the amendment so that a real estate construction sign <br /> would not be up for years and years waiting for completion of a <br /> project. <br /> Pat Camp, 7121 Centerville Road, was present in the audience and <br /> asked questions of the proposed amendment. <br /> Gunnar Pettersen, Building Inspector, was also present in the <br /> audience and expressed his concern that a year and a half was too <br /> short, and it also would depend on when the 90% completion occurs <br /> in relationship to the size of a project. <br /> Chairman Tourville expressed that since the size of the signs <br /> were reduced, and that they were on private property, that they <br /> should not be considered different from any other private <br /> business and it would be a benefit to the City to have a project <br /> completed. The primary concern seems to be that they do not want <br /> the signs to stay there forever. <br /> Motion by Welk, second by Drilling to adjourn public hearing, <br /> motion carried unanimously. Hearing adjourned at 7:23 p.m. <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning <br /> Commission held a public hearing on October 3, 1989, at City <br /> Hall. The purpose was to hear all persons present regarding a <br /> request for variance from the Side Yard Setbacks of Ordinance #4, <br /> Table B, Schedule of District Regulations, lot and yard <br /> requirements to erect a home six (6) additional feet into the <br /> east and /or west property lines of the property described as <br /> follows: the west one third of lots 7, 8 & 9, Block 2 in <br /> Centerville. The property address is 1736 Main Street. Chairman <br /> Tourville called the hearing to order at 7 :30 p.m. Present: <br /> Welk, Drilling, Vermeulen, liaison Neumann. <br /> Dennis Schwallen, Mobilehome Minnesota, was present. Mr. <br /> Schwallen was representing the owners of the property, Mr. and <br /> Mrs. Givens. Mr. Schwallen explained that with the narrowness of <br /> the lot, and the fact that mobile homes do not come in twenty - <br /> four foot widths that a variance was needed to install a twenty- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.