1989-10-03 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P & Z Meeting Minutes October 3, 1989 Page Four street. Any new building must comply with the setbacks. Chairman Tourville expressed that the street can only go to the east, and can not be widened because of the buildings. He also felt that the ordinance was stretched to the limit in 1986, and that they still could build on the lot but would need another design. Gunnar Pettersen, Building Inspector, stated that the buildings were all in line with the other ones, and suggests a 24x40x42 split entry would be feasible. Motion by Welk, second by Vermeulen to recommend to the City Council to deny request for variance at 1736 Main street due to the fact the house is to large for the lot; motion previously denied July 1986, motion carried unanimously. Discussion on the proposed amendment to Ordinance #4, Chairman Tourville expressed concern on the wordage of the amendment. Motion by Vermeulen, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council the adoption of Ordinance #4, Section 32.03 -7 amendment as follows: Now Reads: The following signs upon the securing of a special use permit, as provided in Section 64 of this ordinance for each such sign: (1) Real Estate development signs may be erected to promote a residential project of ten (10) or more dwelling units. Such signs will not exceed one hundred (100) square feet per side and shall be removed when the project is ninety (90) percent completed, sold or leased. Is amended to read: Real Estate development signs shall be permitted if they meet the following requirements: (1) Signs shall not be placed upon private property unless written permission is obtained from the owner, (2) Signs shall be placed twenty five (25) feet from the curb edge, (3) Signs shall not exceed the dimensions of 6'x10',