1989-05-11 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Miltz- Miller April 12, 1989 Page Two 6. There was a statement in the discussion of the development framework section about the fact that the existing streets within the City are in good condition. We would reference you to the 1989 Overlay and Patching Program which better clarifies existing street conditions. 7. When there is discussion of the requirement for multi -use trailways within any future development, a restriction of 4' width may not provide for a sufficient design for bicycles and pedestrians. If a wider design is considered, the City may wish to make the Developer responsible for the entire trail. 8. Within the Development Framework section under the East District, there was discussion regarding the discouraging of any development south of Clearwater Creek. This recommendation was supported, in part, by the fact that much of it is within a flood plain. It should be noted that the flood plain study may re- define the boundaries of the flood plain within this area. As a resUit any zoning recommendation or development restriction at this time may be premature. 9. Within the Plan Implementation Section it was indicated that lot building per phase of development should be limited to 25. This may be too restricting. Possibly a larger number, say up to 40, may be more appropriate. We see our involvement, once the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted, as helping the City in preparation of the Capital Improvement Program outlined in the Plan Update for streets and utilities. We feel it is important to note that we concur with the utility recommendations outlined in the Plan Update. We will be prepared to discuss the items listed as our comments regarding the plan at your convenience. Yours very truly, MA ER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joh :. Stewart, P.E. JBS/jt •