1989-05-11 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Some of these policies may be relevant where highway acquisition is involved. However, that is state law and the city is bound by same. Otherwise, these policies provide little if any benefit and may place the city at a significant disadvantage. 18. P. 49, Land Disposition Policies - consider deletion of items #1 and #2; in whose view is a sale equitable? Obviously, the city must follow state law in such sales. 19. P. 51, #5 - again the self- imposed obligation to con- stantly monitor and update design guideline regulations appears unreasonable and may subject the city or its officials to necessary and frivilous criticism. Consider language less demanding such as a bi- annual review with the Planning Commission, etc. 20. P. 52, #3 - where public hearings are required, it may be beneficial to hold prior informational meetings; however, that is probably the exception and not the rule. An informational meeting requires the attendance of the council, the Planning Commission or some other body requiring the expenditure of time, money and resources. Such in- formational meetings should be discretionary, subject to the approval of the council. A word of caution is needed. Assuming you had or now have a sense of the role that the comprehensive plan plays in the development of the city, an in the drafting and enforcement of the implementing ordinances, it then becomes important to focus on the impact of that document upon the city council, the Planning Commission and any other appointed commission. It is well and good indeed the law requires that the city adopt a comprehensive plan. However, those involved in its adoption and implementation should not disregard the potential, adverse impact which attends that plan. It should be visionary in what it contemplates for the city. It should be conservative as to the burdens it imposes upon the city. The goals are visionary. It is the policies which must be carefully reviewed and drafted such that they may not be used against the city. If those policies are mandatory and constitute self - imposed obligations, view each in the context of whether you will be able to defend it if challenged. If those policies merely provide guidelines leaving the mandates to the implementation ordinances, then challenges are unlikely. Consider if and how you would defend each policy against an allegation that the city has failed to follow same. If you are comfortable that the policy can be defended or no defense is necessary, that policy is one with which the city can proceed. -6-