1989-05-11 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning and Zoning Comp Plan Meeting Minutes page six May 11, 1989 to feel that the illustration of this district tied the City down to put streets in as shown. Welk noted that the park illustrated in the district has to much street frontage with regard to assessments. *Question: page 124 - Central District Recommendations - #3. Eastern side of Center Oaks II (zoned commercial at this time). If so wouldn't it have to be rezoned at the request of the property owner. (L'Allier) *Response: Mack advised that he would review this section and "clean up" the page to not exclude commercial. To be reviewed by the City Council. Question: page 131 - Plan Implementation Priority Level III - last paragraph. 1. How would this occur (there shall be no guarantee that property will remain within the Centerville MUSA). 2. Explain. Pertaining to what area of the City. ( L'Allier) page 132 - Development Priority Level II - paragraph 3. Ordinarily aren't MUSA extensions usually confirmed by City, then Metro and then contracts executed? ( L'Allier) Response: MUSA is not the property owners right. The decision has to be made by the City to properly allocate where development is occurring. If land is to be taken out of the MUSA, it would require City action and a Comp Plan amendment. Other comments not relating to specific page numbers: Question: The Park and Recreation Committee are making revisions to their Park Comprehensive Plan, This could be added to the Centerville Comprehensive Plan as an addendum. (Felton) Response: Addressed earlier in the meeting. Per Mack, if this were adopted by the City, it would be a major amendment. Question: Look at developing a Flood Plain reduction strategy. (Rezoning, MUSA extensions, etc.) (Felton) Response: The City Council is now working on this.