1987-08-04 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SUBJECT: BEDESIGNATION OF LOT LINE COMMON TO LOT 13 AND LOT 14, Block 12 — BURQUE ADDITION 11, CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: PROBLEM(S) 1. Recently established location of actual lot line referenced above has revealed the fact property (small shed and garden area) originally thought to be within lot line constraints for lot 14, block 2 are actually encroaching on property belonging to lot 13, block 2 to a substantial degree. 2. There is approximately 27' between the south face of existing garage on lot 13 and the north face of existing garage on lot 164. However, existing lot line location will not allow property owner of lot 13 to expand garage to double car capacity without the need for an approximate 2' variance. SOLUTION: Both problems 11 and 662 above can be resolved to mutual benefit and satisfaction of both affected property owners by "redesignating" location of the common lot line per attached "sketch ". This proposed lot line redesignation will permit the owner of lot 663 to expand garage to approximate width of 21' staying within the requirement for the "code" established 10' side line set back and at the same time preserving the 10' set back for existing garage on lot 14. And, this lot line redesignation will allow property owner of lot 664 to maintain current locationof his shed and garden area and eliminate the now existing encroachment. (NOTE): Both property owners of lots 13 and 14 are aware there will be a need for "survey" work to accurately establish new location of lot line along with the need for new legal description to document this lot line change. All costs for these outside services to be shared equally by "then current" owners of lots 13 and 14. APPROVALS: The undersigned property owners of lots 13 and 164, block 2 of Burque addition 11 request the planning and zoning commission of Centerville, Minnesota review the above petition to allow common lot line redesignation as proposed (above) during their meeting scheduled for August 4, 1987 and pass a favorable recommendation to the City Council for their final approval at their meeting scheduled for August 5, 1987. Since any impact from the solution to the above described "problems" will be solely and totally inclusive on us as the affected property owners we cannot foresee nor do we anticipate any justifiable objection from any outside source(s). CONCURRENCE: We, the undersigned, being the legally established owners of lots 13 and 14, block 2, Burque addition 11, have a full and complete understanding of all of the above and share mutual agreement the above represents the only practical solution to both problems 11 and 12. Consideration from both the Centerville, Minnesota Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council resulting in a final and favorable response will allow us (the respective property owners) to move forward in a manner best serving our collective /individual interests. Thank you. 4V MI (Owners of lot 13 block 12) (Owners of lot 14, block 12} Burque additi 11. Burque addition 11