Laserfiche WebLink
Park & Recreation Committee Report to the City Council on Nov. 9, 1988: <br /> The following are the results of the Royal Meadows residents appearance at the <br /> November P&R meeting regarding the Hardwood Ponds development park Land <br /> aquisition. The recently aquired park land is located in the northwest comer of the <br /> development property and abutts the existing retaining pond. The intended use of the <br /> park is to develop a turf trail approximately halfway down the slope, between the <br /> residents' property line and the pond edge. The trail would include entry points at Brian <br /> Way, Royal Meadows Park and Ann Street. No athletic facilities or play equipment are <br /> included in the proposed plans. The park is to be brough to fine grade condition with a <br /> minimum of 4" topsoil, seeded and straw mulched, if possible this fall, by the developer. <br /> The land aquisition includes 80% of the possible land that could be aquired for park <br /> dedication. <br /> We anticipate the major park users will be the residents of Royal Meadows and Hardwood <br /> Ponds. Along this trail they will be able to gain access to Royal Meadows Park and to the <br /> park in the Centerville Heights development, as well as possible future parks in adjacent <br /> proposed developments. In addition, this trail provides a link in a pedestrian system that <br /> will allow children to travel to Centerville Elementary School without being exposed to <br /> the dangers of the County roads. <br /> The following are the issues of concem that the residents of Royal Meadows brought to <br /> the attention of the Park and Recreation Committee at the November meeting: <br /> 1) Loss of privacy <br /> 2) Traffic <br /> 3) Garbage <br /> 4) ATVs and snowmobiles <br /> 5) Vandalism <br /> 6) Gravel path <br /> 7) Loss of nesting area for the water fowl <br /> 8) Flooding from runoff if the outlet is plugged <br /> 9) Pond is not within the DNR jurisdiction <br /> 10) Child safety, kidnapping <br /> 11) Liability <br /> 12) Kids/traffic disturbing waterfowl <br /> 13) Mosquito hole potential <br /> 14) Decreased value of adjacent homes <br /> 15) Increased access to water if cattails are removed = danger to kids <br /> 16) RM park is not big enough to serve 4 or 5 kids now, can't handle more kids <br /> 17) Increased Police calls <br /> 18) Don't want their kids to be able to go through the rest of the City <br /> 19) Quality of pond would improve if 1' deeper than current level <br /> 20) Don't want to see people walking by <br /> Suggestions from Royal Meadows residents (* indicates feasible in the short term): <br /> 1) Block entrance to the trails w. bollards, boulders, cable to prevent ATV, etc. traffic* <br /> 2) Tree line at property edge, widely spaced and pruned up to allow view and define <br /> property* <br /> 3) Pond edge planting to discourage kids in pond and establish wildlife habitiat* <br /> 4) No gravel path* <br /> 5) Develop feeding stations <br /> 6) Minimum depth of pond to allow for ducks and cattails* <br /> 7) Fence <br />