Laserfiche WebLink
Park and Recreation Committee <br /> September 15th, 1988 Meeting Minutes <br /> Present: Carol Pelton Steve Dixon <br /> Cindy Paschke Leon L'Allier <br /> Gerard LeTendre <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7 :20 p.m. <br /> Public Works Director, Orville Hughes, reported that the old skating <br /> rink has been straightened, and that P & R will be receiving a bill <br /> for class 5 that was required to fill holes at the old rink. Mr. <br /> Hughes also mentioned the possibility of acquiring a used slide for <br /> $25. P & R members stated that they would need to see the condition <br /> of the slide. <br /> After reporting that a bid of approximately $1300 was received for <br /> the fence in Royal Meadows that was mentioned in the August minutes, <br /> Steve Dixon made the motion to accept the August meeting minutes as <br /> written, LeTendre second, unanimously accepted. <br /> After reviewing the City Council minutes, Steve Dixon made a motion <br /> to recommend to the City Council that if a building is built for <br /> the transmitter in Centerville Heights Park, that it be built <br /> with similar architecture as building on site, second by Paschke, <br /> unanimously accepted. <br /> P & R's recommendation for report 167.01 in response to the N.A.C. <br /> Centerville Development Plan for the Northeastern Area with respect <br /> to the concept plan recommendations are as follows; #3 recommendation <br /> of 1.7 acres of park land, see Centerhill proposal recommendation, <br /> #4 recommendation for provision of trailways is fine in principle, <br /> but the trailways should be in usable condition with it graded and <br /> bituminous with the rest seeded. Steve Dixon made the motion <br /> to recommend the above recommendations, LeTendre second, unanimously <br /> accepted. <br /> P & R's recommendation for report 167.03 - 88.02 in response to the <br /> N.A.C. Centerville Development Plan for the Centerhill Addition <br /> Subdivision with respect to the proposals recommendations are as <br /> follows: #2 P & R recommends not to follow this recommendation as <br /> this appears to be a redundant access, #3 same as #2 as it services <br /> too small a user group, #8 P & R recommends the following recommend- <br /> ation as it is vital to the safety of the citizens of Centerville, <br /> #10 P & R disagrees with the recommendation that 1.7 acres is an <br /> appropriate amount of land and the proposed land does not provide <br /> adequate land for recreational facilities. F & R recommends to take <br /> approximately four acres of land to insure usable space for recreat- <br /> ional facilities. P & R recommends to propose park land as shown <br /> in exhibit 1, which includes a revised road layout, and eliminates <br /> two lots in the corner of Fox and Brian. P & R also recommends that <br /> the following conditions be met: <br /> 1. That park dedication land exclude road and utilities easements <br /> when figuring the total park dedication area, and that the remainder <br /> be paid in lieu. <br />