My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-11-01 Agenda
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2000
>
2000-11-01 Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2010 2:38:54 PM
Creation date
1/8/2010 2:38:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the old or new Ordinance #4 was in effect at the <br /> time Mr. Salazar began construction of the fence. Mr. March stated that Mr. Salazar had begun <br /> construction of the fence prior to the new ordinance. <br /> Mayor Wilharber questioned whether there was any opposition to the fence from others in the <br /> neighborhood. Mr. March stated that he was unaware of opposition to the fence and noted the two <br /> (2) letters presented by the Salazars, <br /> Council Member Nelson indicated she had received a complaint from the neighbor directly across <br /> the street from the Salazars expressing concern that the fence is too close to the sidewalk. <br /> Mr. Salazar indicated he is obligated to keeping the sidewalk clear and will continue to do so. <br /> Mayor Wilharber questioned Mr. Salazar as to snow removal, fence obstruction of same and <br /> indicated that disposing of snow into the street was not allowed. Mr. Salazar indicated his <br /> snowblower would blow the snow up and over the fence into his backyard. Mr. Salazar stated his <br /> willingness to sign any document the City would require of him to acknowledge his financial <br /> responsibility for any repairs to the fence should it be damaged or need to be removed if the City <br /> allowed it to remain in its current location. <br /> Council Member Nelson questioned the purpose of completing the fence prior to fulfilling the <br /> Council's previous requirement in regards to the kennel. <br /> Mayor Wilharber made a point of order comment indicating questions regarding the kennel were <br /> not relative to the Variance Public Hearing. <br /> Council Member Nelson indicated her question was meant to clarify the comments Mr. Salazar <br /> had previously made. <br /> Mr. Salazar stated that in order to cement the floor of the kennel, it needs to be partially <br /> disassembled and the cement would then need to dry prior to reassembly. Mr. Salazar estimated <br /> the process to take approximately one week and during this time, the dogs would not have an <br /> enclosure. <br /> Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Mayor Wilharber to close the public <br /> hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:27 p.m. <br /> 4. Northern Forest Products — Five Year Tax Abatement <br /> Mr. March indicated the official public hearing on the tax abatement was scheduled for November <br /> 8, 2000. He told Council he had been working with Ehlers and Associates and Mr. McDowell, <br /> Northern Forest Products, to establish the proposed increase in taxable market valuation for the <br /> proposed expansion. Accurate figures should be available for the October 25, 2000 Council <br /> meeting. <br /> No comments were heard from the audience. <br /> Page 4 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.