My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-01-07 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2003
>
2003-01-07 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2007 9:24:08 AM
Creation date
1/17/2006 4:02:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 7, 2003 <br /> <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to allow it. He then indicated that the majority of <br />the homes will be full basement type homes, either two story or rambler. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson estimated that, if approved, he would like to grade the development in 2003, <br />install utilities in early 2004 and begin home sales later in 2004 with approximately six <br />homes sold in 2004 followed by 12 homes in 2005 and the balance of the lots sold in <br />2006. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson asked what the property zoning is. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated it IS currently zoned agricultural and <br />indicated the zoning would have to be changed. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson asked what zoning the first phase of Hunter's Crossing used. After some <br />discussion it was determined that the first phase of Hunter's Crossing is zoned R-5. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson commented that the only way have the varying lot sizes would be to ask for <br />R2- A zoning or a PUD. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson asked if it would be possible to use R2-A with different square footages. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine explained that with this type of development it would make more <br />sense to use the PUD designation. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that R2-A would allow for twin homes and <br />she did not think the City would want to do that. <br /> <br />After some discussion it was determined that a PUD designation, provided the <br />development met all the criteria, would make the most sense. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson commented that Lot 14 did not seem to have much buildable lot if the <br />wetlands stay as is. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson indicated that the drawing provided is very conceptual and was done on a <br />computer. He further indicated that he would need to go back and rework that lot as well <br />as some of the corner lots to make it completely accurate. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine indicated the concept looked good and said the first development <br />was nIce. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber asked for an average lot size. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson indicated he did not yet have that information. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber asked whether Mr. Carlson would be willing to pay any costs <br />associated with the request to move up the MUSA phasing. <br /> <br />Page 2 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.