My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-14 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2010
>
2010-04-14 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2010 4:19:51 PM
Creation date
4/9/2010 4:04:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMO <br />TO: Parks & Recreation Committee <br />FROM: Kim Stephan <br />DATE: April 8, 2010 <br />SUBJECT: Committee Review of Pergola Plans per Mr. Mark Statz, City Engineer <br />Mr. Statz, City Engineer requested the committee review a sketch of the proposed pergola <br />(Cornerstone Park) with sandblasted concrete posts to match the treatment of the sidewalks and <br />fountain curb. The only thing he requested the committee look at was whether or not they would <br />approve the concrete posts (four corner posts). Other choices would be steel (more expensive, more <br />maintenance) or timber (susceptible to vandals). He stated the concrete design would be Bonestroo's <br />recommendation, but we are open to whatever the committee may suggest. <br />The committee discussed the options of wood timbers versus concrete posts and felt without seeing <br />what the posts would look like it was hard to determine and would like the bids to be solicited with <br />both timber and concrete posts. They would also like to request Mr. Statz supply a picture of what <br />each would look like as well as the dimensions of the pergola. The committee was not opposed to the <br />durability of the concrete posts, but felt it would look more appealing with timbers. The committee <br />removed the pergola from the original plan for multiple reasons; it was too expensive and were <br />concerned what the impression of the community would be to spending these funds at this time and 2) <br />they felt it was too big for this particular park. The committee was under the impression that if the <br />pergola was submitted as an alternate and it was determined to be not within the budget that the <br />footings would be installed without the pergola for consideration at a later date. If the pergola is not <br />built the committee would prefer the footings not be put into place, they would like the footings and <br />pergola to be in the bid together. Mayor Capra suggested that if the pergola is within the budget and <br />included in the plan that it could be moved to another location as long as it is trailside. Ms. Stephan <br />will ask this question of Mr. Statz. Mayor Capra clarified the bid process with alternates in that if <br />there are multiple alternates included and they come in within budget the City can accept all the <br />alternates or single options if there are more than one. So for instance the pergola could be added and <br />not the kiosk or vise - versa. The landscape designers for Bonestroo felt the pergola would give a nice <br />balance to the fountain instead of the fountain looking so big and standing alone in the park. <br />Motion was made by Committee Member Haiden, seconded by Committee Member Seeley to <br />recommend City Council suggest Mr. Statz, City Engineer submit the plans for the bid process <br />to include both options of wood timber and concrete posts for the pergola in Corner Stone Park <br />including the footings with the pergola, having no requirement for footings if the pergola is not <br />built. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.